| United States of America v. Jonathan Leslie Allen, AKA Johnathan Allen, AKA Ghost |
|
Spokane, Washington, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm. The Defendant claimed that the government commit grand jury abuse by offering perjured testimony. Allen alleges that testimony from an undercover agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) was false because Allen did not “meet” with ag $ (11-17-2025 - wa) |
| Josias Ortiz v. Andrew Sidley-Mackie |
|
Denver, Colorado, pro se Plaintiff sued his lawyer to remove his lawyer on its state criminal case. Sidley-Mackie allegedly refused to do so and instead fraudulently represented to the Colorado Court of Appeals that Ortiz may not be competent to self- represent. Based on these allegations, Ortiz filed this federal lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that Sidley-Mackie had violated his $ (11-30-2025 - CO) |
| Margaret Starks v. St. Louis County, et al. |
|
St. Louis, Missouri, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a deliberate indifference constitutional violation theory. |
| Stephen Lee Allen v. District Court |
|
Bartlesville, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with murder in the first-degree. |
| Stephen Benavides v. Harris County, Texas |
|
Houston, Texas, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.c. 1983. |
| Marcus L. Willis v. Diaz De Leon, Jeff Williams, Chief, City of Bedford |
|
Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
| Juliana Swink v. Souothern Health Partners, Inc., et al. |
|
Greensboro, North Carolina personal injury lawyer represents the Plaintiff on medical malpractice, wrongful death and civil rights claims. |
| Jeanne Llera and Jorge L. Gomez v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department |
|
Las Vegas, Nevada, personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights violation theories. $1 (11-18-2025 - NV) |
| Ronald Jensen v. Cody Lane, et al. |
|
Denver, Colorado, personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a civil rights violation, 42 U.S.C. 1983 claim. $0 (11-17-2025 - VT) |
| William Henry Jamerson v. City of Tulsa, et al. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff was charged with first-degree rape in 1991. |
| Estate of Donovan L. Lewis v. City of Columbus, Ohio, et al. |
|
Columbus, Ohio personal injury lawyer represents the Plaintiff who sued on an excessive force civil rights violation theory. |
| Myisha Niter, et al. v. Marian Brown, et al. |
|
Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a deliberate indifference civil rights violation theory. |
| Guistina Aprileo v. Cheryl Claporood, et al. |
|
Springfield, Massachusetts, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an excessive force claim. |
| Jay F. Vermillion v. Tom Francum, et al. |
|
Indianapolis, Indiana, civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff on civil rights violation theory. |
| Andrew D. Coe v. Darrin Atkins, et al. |
|
Chicago, Illinois, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories. |
| Ibhar Al Mheid v. Kathy Mincihew, et al. |
|
Macon, Georgia, Ibhar Al Mheid, proceeding pro se, without a lawyer, filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of Georgia against a police officer, a prosecutor, a state court judge, and a jail healthcare provider, bringing claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law. |
| Mr Michael Devin Floyd v. Santa Clara Department of Corrections, et al. |
|
San Francisco, California civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who claimed that his rights were violated by the Defendants. |
| United States of America v. Devin Long |
|
Cleveland, Ohio, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with drug possession and firearm felonies. |
| Charles Bozzo v. Jennifer Nanasy, et al. |
|
Grand Rapids, Michigan, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
| Malcolm Scott and De’Marchoe Carpenter v. City of Tulsa, et al. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs on civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
| Robert W. Otto and Julies H. Hamilton v. City of Boca Radon, Florida and County of Palm Beach, Florida |
|
Miami, Florida personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on civil rights violation theories un 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
| Chanetlle Jones v. City of Sarasota Springs |
|
Salt lake City, Utah personal injury laweyrs represented the Plaintiff who soed on a 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights violation theory. $1 (10-20-2025 - UT) |
| Estate of Ian Simmers v. County of King, et al. |
|
Seattle, Washington, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a civil rights violation claim. |
| United States of America v. Estate of Anthony Ray Lopez, Sr. v. City of Oontairo, et al. |
|
San Bernardino, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs on 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights violation theory. |
| Alonzo G. Davison v. Clifford Smith, et al |
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, inmate proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. |
|
Next Page |