| State of Oklahoma v. Donald Lee Gibson |
|
Norman, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with frist-degree murder, injury to a minor child, conspiracy to unlawfully removed a dead body, and unlawful removal of a dead body. ¶1 Appellant Donald Lee Gilson was tried by jury for First Degree Murder (21 O.S.1991, § 701.7(C)), Case No. CF-96-245; five counts of Injury to a Minor Child (10 O.S.Supp.1995, § 711 $ (10-30-2000 - OK) |
| State of Oklahoma v. Kenneth Ray Kinchion |
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Conspiracy to Commit a Felony, Robbery with a Dangerous Weapon and ; First Degree Murder; Robbery with a Dangerous Weapon and Felonious Possession of a Firearm. ¶1 Appellant Kenneth Ray Kinchion was tried by jury and found guilty of Conspiracy to Commit a Felony, Robbery with a Dangerous Weapon (Counts 1 a $ (12-12-2003 - OK) |
| Luther Poynter v. Aaron Bennett |
|
Bowling Green, Kentucky, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a 82 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights violation theory. Luther Poynter was incarcerated in the Barren County Detention Center (“BCDC”) on December 25, 2020, for contempt of court due to his failure to pay child support. On December 28, BCDC moved Poynter to a general-population cell, where Scotty Wix and Timothy Guess were $ (12-17-2025 - KY) |
| Peter Hearn v. Kevin Truesdale, et al. |
|
Boise, Idaho, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a 42 U.S.C. 1983 Civil Rights Act violation theory. $ (12-12-2025 - ID) |
| Mekhi Johnson and Amber Garrity v. Williamsport Bureau of Police, et al. |
|
Williamsport, Pennsylvania, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on a civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The Plaintiffs claimed that Williamsport Police Office Benjamin Hitesman wrongully arrested Mekhi Johnson, concealing evidence proving that he was not guilty and keeping detained for nearly a month. $ (12-13-2025 - PA) |
|
Chicago, Illinois, personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an excessive force civil rights violation theory. This is a tragic case involving a police encounter in the Austin neighborhood of Chicago. Officers Christian Szczur and David Cook responded to a notice early one morning that a shot had been fired in the area. While investigating the gunshot, they approached Juan $ (12-05-2025 - IL) |
| United States of America v. Jonathan Leslie Allen, AKA Johnathan Allen, AKA Ghost |
|
Spokane, Washington, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm. The Defendant claimed that the government commit grand jury abuse by offering perjured testimony. Allen alleges that testimony from an undercover agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) was false because Allen did not “meet” with ag $ (11-17-2025 - wa) |
| Josias Ortiz v. Andrew Sidley-Mackie |
|
Denver, Colorado, pro se Plaintiff sued his lawyer to remove his lawyer on its state criminal case. Sidley-Mackie allegedly refused to do so and instead fraudulently represented to the Colorado Court of Appeals that Ortiz may not be competent to self- represent. Based on these allegations, Ortiz filed this federal lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that Sidley-Mackie had violated his $ (11-30-2025 - CO) |
| Margaret Starks v. St. Louis County, et al. |
|
St. Louis, Missouri, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a deliberate indifference constitutional violation theory. |
| Stephen Lee Allen v. District Court |
|
Bartlesville, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with murder in the first-degree. |
| Stephen Benavides v. Harris County, Texas |
|
Houston, Texas, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.c. 1983. |
| Marcus L. Willis v. Diaz De Leon, Jeff Williams, Chief, City of Bedford |
|
Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
| Juliana Swink v. Souothern Health Partners, Inc., et al. |
|
Greensboro, North Carolina personal injury lawyer represents the Plaintiff on medical malpractice, wrongful death and civil rights claims. |
| Jeanne Llera and Jorge L. Gomez v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department |
|
Las Vegas, Nevada, personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights violation theories. $1 (11-18-2025 - NV) |
| Ronald Jensen v. Cody Lane, et al. |
|
Denver, Colorado, personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a civil rights violation, 42 U.S.C. 1983 claim. $0 (11-17-2025 - VT) |
| William Henry Jamerson v. City of Tulsa, et al. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff was charged with first-degree rape in 1991. |
| Estate of Donovan L. Lewis v. City of Columbus, Ohio, et al. |
|
Columbus, Ohio personal injury lawyer represents the Plaintiff who sued on an excessive force civil rights violation theory. |
| Myisha Niter, et al. v. Marian Brown, et al. |
|
Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a deliberate indifference civil rights violation theory. |
| Guistina Aprileo v. Cheryl Claporood, et al. |
|
Springfield, Massachusetts, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an excessive force claim. |
| Jay F. Vermillion v. Tom Francum, et al. |
|
Indianapolis, Indiana, civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff on civil rights violation theory. |
| Andrew D. Coe v. Darrin Atkins, et al. |
|
Chicago, Illinois, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories. |
| Ibhar Al Mheid v. Kathy Mincihew, et al. |
|
Macon, Georgia, Ibhar Al Mheid, proceeding pro se, without a lawyer, filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of Georgia against a police officer, a prosecutor, a state court judge, and a jail healthcare provider, bringing claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law. |
| Mr Michael Devin Floyd v. Santa Clara Department of Corrections, et al. |
|
San Francisco, California civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who claimed that his rights were violated by the Defendants. |
| United States of America v. Devin Long |
|
Cleveland, Ohio, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with drug possession and firearm felonies. |
| Charles Bozzo v. Jennifer Nanasy, et al. |
|
Grand Rapids, Michigan, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
|
Next Page |