Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

18 USC 751(a) - Escape from Custody... More...   $0 (03-14-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

18 USC 1038(a)(1): False Information and Hoaxe... More...   $0 (03-13-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

21 USC 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B)(ii)(II): Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Distribute; Forfeiture Allegation: 21 USC 853: Drug Forfeiture

... More...   $0 (03-14-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

18 USC 922(g)(5)(A) and 924(a)(8): Alien Unlawfully in the United States in Possession of a Firearm; Forfeiture Allegation: 18 USC 924(d)(1) and 28 USC 2461(c): Firearms Forfeiture
... More...   $0 (03-13-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the defendant charged with:

21 USC 846 and 841(b)(1)(A)(viii): Drug Conspiracy; Forfeiture Allegation: 18 USC 924(d)(1), 21 USC 853 and 28 USC 2461(c): Drug and Firearms Forfeiture
21 USC 846 and 841(b)(1)(A)(viii): Drug Conspiracy; Forfeiture Allegation: 18 USC 924(d)(1), 21 USC 853, and 28 USC 2461(c): Drug and Firearms Forfeiture... More...   $0 (03-13-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:
21 USC 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C): Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Distribute; Forfeiture Allegation: 18 USC 924(d)(1), 21 USC 853, and 28 USC 2461(c): Drug and Firearms Forfeiture.
18 USC 924(c)(1)(A)(i): Possession of a Firearm in Furtherance of a Drug Trafficking Crime; Forfeiture Allegation: 18 USC 92... More...   $0 (03-11-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:
18 USC 1151, 1153, 1201(a)(2), and 1201(d): Attempted Kidnapping in Indian Country; Forfeiture Allegation: 18 USC 924(d)(1) and 28 USC 2461(c) - Firearms Forfeiture.
... More...   $0 (03-14-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:
18 USC 1151, 1152, and 1363: Malicious Mischief in Indian Country
18 USC 1151 and 1153; 21 OS 1435 and 1436: Third Degree Burglary in Indian Country
... More...   $0 (03-14-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:
Possession of Methamphetamine with Intent to Distribute, in violation of 21 USC 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A)(viii).... More...   $0 (03-11-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

18 USC 1151, 1153 and 2241(c): Aggravated Sexual Abuse of a Minor Under 12 Years of Age in Indian Country; Forfeiture Allegation: 18 USC 2253(a) and 2428: Child Exploitation Forfeiture

18 USC 1151, 1153 and 2241(c): Aggravated Sexual Abuse of a Minor by Force and Threat in Indian Country; Forfeiture ... More...   $0 (03-10-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, social security disability lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking review of the denial of her application for disability benefits by HHS.... More...   $0 (03-10-2025 - )

Tulsa, Oklahoma social security disability lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking review of the denial of his application for social security disability benefits by HHS.... More...   $0 (03-10-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury civil ltigiation lawyer represented the Plaintiff claiming that Paul Tubbs' civil rights were violated by the Defendant police officers.

... More...   $0 (02-25-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights violation lawyers represented the Plaintiff claiming to have been injured and/or damaged as a direct result of the denial of the civil rights of T.W. and B.S., minors, by Allie Friesen
in her official capacity as the acting Commissioner of the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services.

... More...   $0 (03-10-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

21 USC 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C): Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Distribute; Forfeiture Allegation: 21 USC 853: Drug Forfeiture... More...   $0 (03-12-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with;

18 USC 1151, and 1153; 21 OS 843.5(A) - Child Abuse in Indian Country

18 USC 1151 and 1153; 21 OS 843.5(C) - Child Neglect in Indian Country... More...   $0 (03-13-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

21 USC 331(a) and 333(a)(2): Introduction of a Misbranded Drug into Interstate Commerce; Forfeiture Allegation: 18 USC 982(a)(7), 18 USC 2253, and 21 USC 853 - Drug and Child Exploitation Forfeiture

21 USC 856(a)(1) and 856(b) - Maintaining a Drug-Involved Premises; Forfeiture Allegation: 18 USC 982(... More...   $0 (03-12-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

18 USC 1151, 1153, and 1112(a): Involuntary Manslaughter in Indian Country

18 USC 1151, 1153 and 113(a)(6): Assault Resulting in Serious Bodily Injury in Indian Country... More...   $0 (03-15-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

18 USC 922(j) and 924(a)(2): Possession of a Stolen Firearm; Forfeiture Allegation: 18 USC 924(d)(1) and 28 USC 2461(c): Firearms Forfeiture.
18 USC 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(8): Felon in Possession of a Firearm and Ammunition; Forfeiture Allegation: 18 USC 924(d)(1) and 28 USC 2461(c): Firearms Forfeiture.... More...   $0 (03-14-2025 - Ok)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with being a felon in possessoin of a firearm in violation of 18 USC 922(g)(9) and 924(a)(8).... More...   $0 (03-13-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a job discrmination claim.

The Plaintiff claimed that the Larry Hood, the City of Tulsa Purchasing Manager, treated her differently than other employees in the purchasing department. She filed a complaint about her disperate treatment in 2019 and claimed that her treatment was racial disciminatory. She claimed that despite ... More...   $1 (03-14-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with unlawful reentry of a removed alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1326.... More...   $0 (03-14-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma commercial litigation lawyers represented the parties in a breach of contract action.... More...   $0 (03-10-2025 - OK)

Grand Rapids, Michigan, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant seeking a reduction in sentence.

Inspired by the Sentencing Commission’s retroactive amendment of a relevant guidelines provision, Kevin Obi asked the district court to reduce his sentence. The district court did so, but in an admittedly modest fashion: it reduced Obi’s 300-month sentence to 293 months. Obi chal... More...   $0 (03-13-2025 - MI)

Justice Went To Hell in Detroit, Michigan George Edward Clark and Kevin Harrington were wrongfully convicted of a murder that they did not commit.

This § 1983 case concerns alleged constitutional violations in the investigation and prosecution of George Clark and Kevin Harrington. Clark and Harrington spent nearly two decades in prison before the Wayne County Prosecution Integrity Unit d... More...   $0 (03-14-2025 - MI)

Houston, Texas civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a wrongful denial of education benefits.

R.W., a student who requires special education and related services for his disabilities, appeals the dismissal of his lawsuit challenging the individualized education program developed for him by the Clear Creek Independent School District (CCISD).... More...   $0 (03-13-2025 - TX)

Houston, Texas, social security disability lawyer represented the Plaintiff whose application for benefits was denied.

Stephanie Foster filed applications with the Social Security Administration (SSA) claiming a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental social security income. After initial denials, Foster requested a hearing before an administrative law judge ... More...   $0 (03-13-2025 - TX)

Houston, Texas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a FELA claim.

The question presented is whether a putative implied tolling agreement between James Chapoy and Union Pacific Railroad Company is enforceable under Texas law. Chapoy alleges that the parties’ course of conduct extended the tolling period for his Federal Employers’ Liability Act claim, which he brought fiv... More...   $0 (03-13-2025 - TX)

Dallas, Texas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1).

Hernandez Ruiz argued that treating a prior felony conviction that increases
the statutory maximum under § 1326(b) as a sentencing factor, rather than a
separate element of the offense, violates the Constitution.... More...   $0 (03-13-2025 - TX)

Dallas, Texas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant seeking compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).... More...   $0 (03-13-2025 - TX)

Dallas, Texas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with transportation of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(1) and (b).... More...   $0 (03-13-2025 - TX)

Dallas, Texas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with transporting and distributing a sexually explicit visual depiction of a minor for importation in the United States.

Markwith argued that the district court abused its discretion by finding that he failed to establish extraordinary and compelling reasons for compassionate relief under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13, p.s. He ... More...   $0 (03-13-2025 - TX)

Dallas, Texas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony possession of a firearm.

First, Jalomo argues that § 922(g)(1) is facially unconstitutional under the Second Amendment in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022). The Government is correct that Jalomo’s Bruen-based challenge to § 922(g)(1) is foreclosed. See Un... More...   $0 (03-13-2025 - OK)

San Francisco, California administrative law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on Administrative Procedure Act theories.

The Plaintiffs sought an injunction prohibiting the arbitrary and capricious firing of federal government employees.
... More...   $0 (03-13-2025 - CA)

Florence, South Carolina civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff challenging city ordinance.

A city ordinance makes it a crime “to broadcast obscene, profane or vulgar language from any commercial property” above certain volumes at certain times. A bar owner sued, arguing the ordinance violates the First Amendment. This appeal involves only the portion of the ordinance restricti... More...   $0 (03-13-2025 - SC)