Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
State of Oregon v. Lametrius Tardrell Davis
Date: 03-18-2026
Case Number: 5CR2271
Judge: Not Available
Court: Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Oregon
Plaintiff's Attorney: Multnomah County, Oregon, District Attorney's Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Portland Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Description:
Portland, Oregon, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with disorderly conduct in the second degree, ORS 166.025.
The facts underlying the incident are largely undisputed. Portland Police responded to a call at about 2:00 a.m. to the Holocene night club in Portland. The record does not contain testimony about the contents of the call, nor why the police were originally dispatched.
* * *
"(1) A person commits the crime of disorderly conduct in the second degree if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, the person:
"(a) Engages in fighting or in violent, tumultuous or threatening behavior;
"(b) Makes unreasonable noise;
"(c) Disturbs any lawful assembly of persons without lawfulauthority;
"(d) Obstructs vehicular or pedestrian traffic on a public way;
concerning an alleged or impending fire, explosion, crime, catastrophe orother emergency; or
"(f) Creates a hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act which the person is not licensed or privileged to do."
The facts underlying the incident are largely undisputed. Portland Police responded to a call at about 2:00 a.m. to the Holocene night club in Portland. The record does not contain testimony about the contents of the call, nor why the police were originally dispatched.
* * *
"(1) A person commits the crime of disorderly conduct in the second degree if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, the person:
"(a) Engages in fighting or in violent, tumultuous or threatening behavior;
"(b) Makes unreasonable noise;
"(c) Disturbs any lawful assembly of persons without lawfulauthority;
"(d) Obstructs vehicular or pedestrian traffic on a public way;
concerning an alleged or impending fire, explosion, crime, catastrophe orother emergency; or
"(f) Creates a hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act which the person is not licensed or privileged to do."
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of State of Oregon v. Lametrius Tardrell Davis?
The outcome was: Affirmed
Which court heard State of Oregon v. Lametrius Tardrell Davis?
This case was heard in Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Oregon, OR. The presiding judge was Not Available.
Who were the attorneys in State of Oregon v. Lametrius Tardrell Davis?
Plaintiff's attorney: Multnomah County, Oregon, District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Portland Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was State of Oregon v. Lametrius Tardrell Davis decided?
This case was decided on March 18, 2026.