Date: 11-09-2015

Case Style: Lilly Hunter v. Charles Freeman Gregorhy and Janice Powell

Case Number: CJ-2013-5134

Judge: Dana Kuehn

Court: District Court, Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Charles Cox

Defendant's Attorney: Andrea Medley

Description: Tulsa, OK - Lilly Hunter sued Charles Freeman Gregorhy and Janice Powell on an auto negligence theory claiming:

1. Plaintiffs are residents of Tulsa, Oklahoma; Defendants, Charles Freeman Gregory and Janice Powell, are residents of Tulsa County, Oklahoma; this cause of action arose in Tulsa County, Oklahoma and the amount in controversy exceeds $10,000.00 exclusive of interest, costs and attorneys’ fees. That suit was brought over this matter by Plaintiffs against Defendants in Case No. CJ-2012-1785, District. Court of Tulsa County. Such suit was dismissed without prejudice on January 23, 2012 for failure to obtain service of process. This suit is commenced within one year of the dismissal of the prior suit and the statute of limitations is thus extended.
Count I.
Negligence
2. On or about October 22, 2010, at road intersection of S. Elwood Ave with W. 68th Street in TULSA County, Oklahoma, Defendant, Charles Freeman Gregory, operated his motor vehicle in a grossly negligent maimer causing the same to strike the vehicle operated by the Plaintiff, Lilly Hunter, in the rear end while same was stopped or slowing to turn.
3. As a result of the DefendanCs negligence described in paragraph “2” above, The Plaintiff, Lilly Hunter, has sustained serious personal injuries; was prevented from transacting her business; has and will suffer pain of mind and body; has and will incur medical expenses; has been disabled; and has been disfigured.
4. As a proximate result of the above matters, Plaintiff, Lilly Hunter, has been damaged in an amount in excess of$l0,000.O0.
Count II.
Negligence
5. Plaintiffs adopt and incorporate by reference herein, the allegations of paragraphs 1-4 above.
6. The Defendant, Charles Freeman Gregory, was operating a vehicle owned by the Defendant,
Janice Powell, and was acting as her agent.
7. The Defendant, Janice Powell, was negligent in entrusting her vehicle to Defendant, Charles
Freeman Gregory, in that his driver’s license was suspended by the State of Oklahoma.
8. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendant, Janice Powell, the Plaintiff,
Lilly Hunter was injured and suffered damages in excess of $10,000.00.
Loss of Consortium
Plaintiff, Jerry Hunter, for his cause of action against the Defendants alleges and states:
9. Plaintiffs adopt and incorporate by reference herein, the allegations of paragraphs
1-8 above.
10. Plaintiff, Jerry Hunter, is now and was at the time of the accident the spouse of the
Plaintiff, Lilly Hunter, injured by the negligence of Defendant.
11. As a result of this accident, he has lost the consortium of his spouse and has been damaged by such loss in an amount in excess of$lO,000.00.
Count III
Exemplary Damages
12. Plaintiffs adopt and incorporate by reference the allegations of paragraphs 1
through 11 hereto and further allege and state.
10. At the time of the accident the defendant was driving in violation of law in that his Driver’s license was suspended by the Oklahoma Department of Public Safety.
11. Each of the Plaintiffs should be awarded exemplary damages in the amount of
$25,000.00.

Outcome: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments: