Date: 01-24-2012

Case Style: Mary E. Raley-Bradley v. David Golzar

Case Number: CJ-2012-00033

Judge: Robert G. Haney

Court: District Court, Delaware County, Oklahoam

Plaintiff's Attorney: Carpenter, Stanley & Myers

Defendant's Attorney: John Bowling

Description: Jay, OK - Mary E. Raley-Bradley sued David Golzar on a personal injury negligence theory seeking a money judgment in excess of $10,000.00.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available.

01/24/2012 FILE AND ENTER PETITION $163.00
LAW LIBRARY ASSESSMENT $6.00
DISPUTE MEDIATION ASSESSMENT $2.00
OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 7/1/04 $25.00
LENGTHY TRIAL FUND FEE $10.00
OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES $5.00
10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND $0.50
OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND $2.00
10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND $0.20
01/24/2012 ISSUING TWO SUMMONS $10.00
07/18/2012 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE
SUMMONS
07/25/2012 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME
09/14/2012 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO
SERVICE SUMMONS
09/17/2012 ORDER GRANTING SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME
11/14/2012 ORDER GRANTING SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME
11/14/2012 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME TO
SERVE SUMMONS
01/16/2013 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN ADDITIONAL EXTENSION OF TIME
TO SERVE SUMMONS
01/23/2013 ORDER GRANTING ADDITIONAL EXTENSION OF TIME
04/02/2013 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF DAVID GOLZAR
04/02/2013 SPECIAL ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND RESERVATION OF TIME ON
BEHALF OF DEFENDANT DAVID GOLZAR
04/23/2013 ANSWER OF DAVID GOLZAR
09/05/2013 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS
11/18/2013 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
11/20/2013 ORDER SETTING HEARING ON MOTION - SET 1/8/14 @ 10AM
12/04/2013 CM: MATTER COMES BEFORE THE COURT ON THE REGULAR SCHEDULED MOTION DOCKET FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; MOTION IS STRICKEN FROM THE
DOCKET - NO ONE APPEARS
01/08/2014 CM: MATTER COMES BEFORE THE COURT ON THE REGULAR SCHEDULED MOTION DOCKET FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; AN AGREED SCHEDULING ORDER
SUBMITTED
01/08/2014 SCHEDULING ORDER
03/21/2014 JE DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
04/15/2014 JE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Outcome: Settled and dismissed with prejudice.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments: