Date: 03-31-2014

Case Style: Gary G. Kuhn v. Erris R. Corn

Case Number: CJ-2009-388

Judge: Patricia G. Parrish

Court: District Court, Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: J. Brent Gaylon

Defendant's Attorney: Anthony Lorinzo Bonner, Jr. and Melissa G. Hendke

Description: COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Gary G. Kuhn, and for his cause of action against the mis R. Corn, states:

1. On or about the 25th day of January, 2007, in the vicinity of N. May and N.W. 63” ma City, Oklahoma, Oklahoma County, Plaintiff and Defendant were involved in an automobile accident proximately caused by the negligent acts of the Defendant.

2. As a result of Defendant’s negligent acts Plaintiff suffered property damage, emotional injuries, both permanent and temporary, incurred and will incur medical Lost wages.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Gary G. Kuhn, prays judgment against the Defendant, Ennis R. onal injury damages exceeding $10,000.00, all costs incurred herein, including and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper.


ENNIS CORN’S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S PETITION

COMES NOW the Defendant, Emiis Corn, and for the answer to the Petition filed on behalf of the Plaintiff, alleges and states as follows:

ADMISSIONS AND DENIALS

1. Defendant generally and specifically denies each and every material allegation contained in the Petition filed on behalf of the Plaintiff except for those which may be specifically admitted hereinafter.

2. Defendant admits that there was a collision of automobiles at the approximate time and location alleged in Plaintiffs Petition.

3. Defendant is without sufficient information, knowledge, or belief to either admit or deny the allegations of injuries and damages alleged in Plaintiffs Petition, and therefore denies the same, and demands strict proof thereof.

4. Discovery in this case is just commencing, and reserves the right to amend her answer to assert additional affirmative defenses as they may be ascertained.

WHEREFORE, premises considered, defendant prays that Plaintiff’s Petition be dismissed and Plaintiff takes nothing thereby; Ilirther Defendant prays for the costs of this action and for such relief as may be fair and equitable.

Outcome: The Plaintiff, Gary Gene Kuhn, hereby dismisses all claims against the Corn, in the above styled and numbered action with prejudice to refiling.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments: