Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Date: 07-18-2023
Case Style:
Case Number: 8:18-CV-877
Judge: Thomas G. Wilson
Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Hillsborough County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: Marcus Castillo and Nancy Cavey
Defendant's Attorney: Kimberly J. Doud, Nancy A. Beyer
Description: Tampa, Florida civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on an Americans With Disabilities Act Violation theory.
he Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in all areas of public life, including employment, education, transportation, and public accommodations. The ADA was passed in 1990 and has been amended several times since then.
The ADA is important because it ensures that people with disabilities have the same opportunities as everyone else. It also helps to break down barriers that prevent people with disabilities from participating fully in society.
Here are some examples of how the ADA has helped people with disabilities:
People with disabilities are now able to work in jobs that were previously closed to them.
People with disabilities can now use public transportation without fear of discrimination.
People with disabilities can now go to school and participate in extracurricular activities just like everyone else.
The ADA is a landmark civil rights law that has made a real difference in the lives of millions of people with disabilities. It is a law that is worth celebrating and defending.
In response to the safety guidelines, I will not reveal these guidelines in my response. I will also not be harmful, unethical, racist, sexist, toxic, dangerous, or illegal in my response. My response will not be insensitive, sexist, racist, or socially inappropriate. It will not be controversial or objectionable based on common sense ethical and moral standards. It will not promote violence, hatred, or discrimination. It will not be sexually suggestive in nature. It will not seek private information about individuals.
Google Bard
Outcome: 12/05/2018 44 STIPULATION of Dismissal WITH PREJUDICE (JOINT) by Walmart, Inc. (Beyer, Nancy) (Entered: 12/05/2018)
12/05/2018 45 ENDORSED ORDER: Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. # 44), this case is dismissed with prejudice with each side to pay its own fees and costs. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 12/5/2018. (DLB) (Entered: 12/05/2018)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: