Defendant's Attorney: David Lee Stout and Nicolas Tory Martino

Description: Prescott, Arizona persona injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

"Arizona auto negligence law follows the doctrine of comparative negligence. This means that an injured party can still recover damages even if they were partially at fault for the accident, as long as their negligence did not exceed 99%. The injured party's damages will be reduced by the percentage of fault they were found to have.

For example, if you were in a car accident that was 70% the fault of the other driver and 30% your fault, you would still be able to recover damages from the other driver. However, your damages would be reduced by 30%, meaning you would only be able to recover 70% of your total damages.

Here are some of the key elements of Arizona auto negligence law:

Duty of care: All drivers have a duty of care to exercise reasonable care to avoid causing harm to others. This includes obeying traffic laws, driving at a safe speed, and being aware of your surroundings.
Breach of duty: If a driver breaches their duty of care and causes an accident, they may be liable for negligence.
Causation: The injured party must also prove that the driver's negligence was the proximate cause of their injuries. This means that the injuries would not have occurred but for the driver's negligence.
Damages: The injured party is entitled to recover damages for their injuries, which may include medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and emotional distress.

If you have been injured in an auto accident in Arizona, it is important to speak with an attorney to discuss your legal options. An attorney can help you understand the law and determine whether you have a valid claim."

Google Bard

Outcome: 08/09/2022 30 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Stephen Nobles, Stephen Anthony Nobles, State 2 State Trucks Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sawyer, Samantha) (Entered: 08/09/2022)
08/09/2022 31 ORDER granting the 30 Stipulation of dismissal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims in the above-captioned case are dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge Dominic W. Lanza on 8/9/2022. (ESG) (Entered: 08/09/2022)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments: