Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Date: 01-27-2020
Case Style:
Case Number: 2:19-cv-01858-JD
Judge: Jan D. Dubois
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Defendant's Attorney: Sean V. Burke
Description: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on copyright infringement theory pursuant for 17 U.S.C. 101, et seq. which provide:
(a) Copyright protection subsists, in accordance with this title, in original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, now known or later developed, from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of a machine or device. Works of authorship include the following categories:
(1) literary works;
(2) musical works, including any accompanying words;
(3) dramatic works, including any accompanying music;
(4) pantomimes and choreographic works;
(5) pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works;
(6) motion pictures and other audiovisual works;
(7) sound recordings; and
(8) architectural works.
(b) In no case does copyright protection for an original work of authorship extend to any idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle, or discovery, regardless of the form in which it is described, explained, illustrated, or embodied in such work.
Outcome: 01/27/2020 13 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41.1(b). SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 1/24/20. 1/28/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, ) (Entered: 01/28/2020)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: