Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Date: 02-17-2023
Case Style:
Case Number: 1:21-cv-02066
Judge: Jennifer L. Rochon
Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Manhattan County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Defendant's Attorney: Robin Jean Gray
Description: New York City, New York civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices) theories.
Outcome:
For the reasons set forth above, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff states a claim for sexual harassment under Title VII as to Passfeed, under the NYSHRL as to Sary, and under the NYCHRL as to Passfeed and Sary. Additionally, she states a claim for retaliation under Title VII as to Passfeed, and under the NYSHRL and NYCHRL as to all three defendants. The Court hereby dismisses the following claims: Plaintiff's NYSHRL sexual harassment claims as to Passfeed; her NYSHRL and NYCHRL sexual harassment claims as to Wang; and her aiding and abetting claims against all defendants.
Accordingly, Plaintiff's first, second, fourth, and seventh causes of action survive in their entirety. Plaintiff's third cause of action survives based on sexual harassment as to Sary, but is dismissed to the extent it is based on sexual harassment as to Passfeed and Wang. The sixth cause of action survives based on sexual harassment as to Passfeed and Sary, but is dismissed to the extent it is based on sexual harassment as to Wang. The fifth and eighth causes of action in her complaint are dismissed entirely.
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Passfeed, Inc., Atilla Sary, Richard Wang and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Jamie Friederick. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Kirschenbaum, Gregory) (Entered: 02/16/2023)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: