Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 12-03-2021

Case Style:

Jason Snyder and Jennifer Snyder v. Equifax Information Services, LLC

Case Number: 0:20-cv-00006-DSD-TNL

Judge: David S. Doty

Court: United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (Hennepin County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:


Best Minneapolis Consumer Law Lawyer Directory


Defendant's Attorney: Christopher J. Haugen, Lauren Hoglund

Description: Minneapolis, Minnesota plaintiff consumer law lawyer sued defendants on Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theories under 15 U.S.C. 1681.

§1681. Congressional findings and statement of purpose
(a) Accuracy and fairness of credit reporting

The Congress makes the following findings:

(1) The banking system is dependent upon fair and accurate credit reporting. Inaccurate credit reports directly impair the efficiency of the banking system, and unfair credit reporting methods undermine the public confidence which is essential to the continued functioning of the banking system.

(2) An elaborate mechanism has been developed for investigating and evaluating the credit worthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, and general reputation of consumers.

(3) Consumer reporting agencies have assumed a vital role in assembling and evaluating consumer credit and other information on consumers.

(4) There is a need to insure that consumer reporting agencies exercise their grave responsibilities with fairness, impartiality, and a respect for the consumer's right to privacy.
(b) Reasonable procedures

It is the purpose of this subchapter to require that consumer reporting agencies adopt reasonable procedures for meeting the needs of commerce for consumer credit, personnel, insurance, and other information in a manner which is fair and equitable to the consumer, with regard to the confidentiality, accuracy, relevancy, and proper utilization of such information in accordance with the requirements of this subchapter.

Outcome: 06/28/2021 59 ORDER on 57 Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Judge David S. Doty on 6/28/2021.(JRC) (Entered: 06/28/2021)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: