Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Date: 01-01-2024
Case Style:
United States of America v. Earl Ingarfield
Case Number:
Judge: Jed S. Rakoff,
Court:
United States District Court for Southern District of New York
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in New York City
Defendant's Attorney:
Description:
m New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant Indicted on Multiple “Pump And Dump” Securities Fraud Schemes
From at least 2013 through March 2014, EARL INGARFIELD was the leader of multiple schemes to manipulate the stock of penny stocks, including the price of SUBB, a public company traded on the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market. In or about 2013, INGARFIELD obtained control of SUBB, installing management at the company that acted at his direction and financing SUBB’s operations. INGARFIELD also obtained convertible promissory notes issued by SUBB, which he then converted into tens of millions of SUBB shares that were nominally held by offshore shell entities. INGARFIELD used these shell entities to conceal his involvement and the fact that he owned and controlled the vast majority of the shares of SUBB.
In early 2014, at INGARFIELD’s direction, SUBB announced that it was purportedly acquiring a producing African diamond mine worth $5 billion. But in reality, no such mine existed. Between January 2014 and March 2014, SUBB issued a series of press releases making false representations regarding that purported mine acquisition and SUBB’s operations. During the same time period, INGARFIELD orchestrated a marketing campaign through which promotional materials echoing the same false claims were distributed to the investing public by email. The false and misleading press releases and email marketing campaign caused SUBB’s share price and trading volume to become artificially inflated.
While SUBB’s price was artificially inflated, INGARFIELD profited by selling millions of his secretly amassed shares, all at the expense of the investing public. Between January and March 2014, he made more than $1.4 million from the sale of SUBB shares.
On March 7, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission halted trading in SUBB, after which the share price dropped precipitously and never recovered.
Outcome: Defendant was sentenced to 30 months in prison
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: