Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 07-28-2023

Case Style:

Admiral's Port Condominium Association, Inc. v. Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company

Case Number: 1:22-cv-23408

Judge: Kathleen M. Williams

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Miami-Dade County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:




Click Here For The Best Florida Insurance Lawyer Directory



Defendant's Attorney: Christine M. Renella, Juan Carlos Quintana, Jr., Bryant Steven Green

Description: Miami, Florida insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant

The plaintiff, Admiral's Port Condominium Association, Inc., is a Florida corporation that owns a condominium complex in Aventura, Florida. The defendants are four insurance companies: Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company, Arch Specialty Insurance Company, James River Insurance Company, and Rockhill Insurance Company.

In 2017, Hurricane Irma caused extensive damage to the condominium complex. The plaintiff filed a claim with the defendants for coverage under the insurance policies. The defendants denied the claim, arguing that the damage was not covered by the policies.

The plaintiff then filed a lawsuit against the defendants, alleging that they had breached the insurance contracts by denying the claim in bad faith. The defendants have filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that the plaintiff's claims are not supported by the facts.

A hearing on the motions to dismiss is scheduled for March 15, 2023.

The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the insurance industry in Florida. If the plaintiff is successful, it could set a precedent that would make it more difficult for insurance companies to deny claims in bad faith.

Here are some of the key legal issues in the case:

Whether the damage to the condominium complex was covered by the insurance policies.
Whether the defendants breached the insurance contracts by denying the claim in bad faith.
Whether the plaintiff can recover punitive damages for the defendants' bad faith conduct.

The case is still in its early stages, so it is difficult to predict how it will be resolved. However, the case is likely to be closely watched by the insurance industry and by lawyers who handle insurance claims.

Outcome: 07/28/2023 65 PAPERLESS ORDER REQUIRING JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the notice indicating that the Parties have reached a settlement. (DE 64 .) Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that on or before August 25, 2023, the Parties shall file a joint stipulation of dismissal. If the Parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction beyond the filing of their joint stipulation, they are advised that they must file the settlement agreement for review and any stipulation must comply with the Eleventh Circuit's holding in Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2012). Otherwise, the dismissal of this matter is effective and self-executing upon the filing of the Parties' joint stipulation of dismissal. Id. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. All hearings, trial settings, and deadlines are CANCELED. This case is CLOSED for administrative purposes. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 7/28/2023. (er01) (Entered: 07/28/2023)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: