Tacoma, Washington immigration lawyer represented Plaintiff seeking a writ of mandamus

28 U.S.C. 1651 provides:

(a) The Supreme Court and all courts established by Act of Congress may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.
(b) An alternative writ or rule nisi may be issued by a just

San Diego, California immigration law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants seeking a writ of mandamous ordering Defendants to perform non-discretional governmental acts.

"A (writ of) mandamus is an order from a court to an inferior government official ordering the government official to properly fulfill their official duties or correct an abuse of discretion." Legal Informatio

Washington, DC immigration law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants seeking a writ of mandamus to adjudicate a via petition pursuant to 08 U.S.C. 1329, which provides:

The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction of all causes, civil and criminal, brought by the United States that arise under the provisions of this subchapter. It shall be the duty of the Un

Austin, Texas consumer credit lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on Collection Practices Act and Texas Debt Collection Practices Act violation theories.


Ozmun contends Defendants then violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and the Texas Debt Collections Act (TDCA) when they (1) sought a default judgment against him for the full $2,065.21[1] and (2) comm

Birmingham, Alabama immigration lawyers represented Plaintiff seeking a writ of mandamus.

A writ of mandamus is a court order that commands a public official or organization to take a specific action. It is an extraordinary remedy, which means that it is only available in limited circumstances.

To obtain a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that the official or organizati

West Palm Beach, Florida consumer law lawyer represent Plaintiff who sued defendant on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theory under 47 U.S.C. 227, which provides, in part:

(b) Restrictions on use of automated telephone equipment
(1) ProhibitionsIt shall be unlawful for any person within the United States, or any person outside the United States if the recipient is withi

Seattle, Washington consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theories.

Defendants claimed to have identified “a real question” regarding the viability of plaintiffs' autodialer claims, and plaintiffs have not shown that they will be prejudiced if a stay is ordered. Wood v. McEwen, 644 F.2d 797, 802 (9th Cir. 1981).<

San Antonio, Texas immigration lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Conn Schrader, Director, National Visa Center, United States Department of State, seeking a writ of mandamus to adjusticate a visa petition.

8 U.S.C. 1329 provides:

The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction of all causes, civil and criminal, brought by the United States that arise under t

Georgetown, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant.


Appellant Gregory Kelley was found guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced to twenty-five years in prison. See Tex. Penal Code § 22.021(a), (f). Following the imposition of his sentence, Kelley filed a motion for new trial, followed by three amended motions for new trial and requests for a hearing.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTONDIVISION IIDONOVAN ALLEN,No. 54172-6-IIAppellant,v.STATE OF WASHINGTON,PUBLISHED OPINIONRespondent.LEE,C.J.—Donovan Allen appeals the trial court’s order granting summary judgmentin favor of the State, which dismissed his claim under the Wrongly Convicted Persons Act (WCPA), chapter 4.100 RCW. Allen spent 13 years in prison for a crime