| City of Tulsa v. Arnett Starks, et al. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma condemnation law lawyer represented the Defendants who were sued by the Plaintiff on an eminent domain law theory seeking to acquire by the exercise of eminent domain certain rights, title and interest o real property owned by the Defendants for public use. |
| United States of America v. Mason Shepherd |
|
NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judge. Mason Shepherd admitted to possessing several |
| City of Tulsa v. Geraldine Hunt, et al. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma condemnation lawyer represented the Defendants sued eminent domain theories to acquire certain rights, title and interests owned by them in real property needed by the City of Tulsa for public purposes. |
| Joseph Blacker and Andrea Memiki Ambrosia v. Bay Bridge Marina Slips, LLC, et al. |
|
Baltimore, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on an admiralty law theory under 28 U.S.C. 1333, which provides: |
| Vladek Filler v. Hancock County, et al. |
|
Concluding that a defendant committed the tort of malicious prosecution, the Court awards $1,769,354 in compensatory, economic, and punitive damages in favor of a man the defendant falsely accused of committing gross sexual assaults and assaults against his then wife. The Court's verdict and judgment runs against his now ex-wife's friend, who conspired with his wife to concoct the allegations that $0 (03-12-2019 - ME) |
| Norma Anderson, et al. v. Jena Griswold, in her official capacity as Colorado Secretary of State and Donald J. Trump |
|
Denver, constitutional law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant seeking a declaratory judgment that Donald Trump violated the 14th Amendment on January 5, 2021 and should be barred from serving as President again. |
| Charles Chesnut, et al. v. City of Baltimore, et al. |
|
This case arises out of the arrest, prosecution, and conviction of Plaintiffs Alfred |
| Alfred Chestnut, et al. v. Donald Kincaid, et al. |
|
Baltimore, Maryland personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories. |
| Richard & Wendy Devillier, et al. v. State of Texas |
|
Houston, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a taking of private property without just compensation (inverse condemnation) in violation of the Texas and United States Constitutions. |
| Talala Properties, LLC v. City of El Reno, OKlahoma |
|
El Reno, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff which sued Defendant claiming wrongful condemnation of its property and wrongful issuance of a notice to vacate Plaintiff's property. $0 (06-19-2023 - OK) |
| City of Oklahoma City v. David Furman Cosper |
|
Norman, Oklahoma condemnation lawyers represented Defendants who were sued by Plaintiff seeking to acquire by eminent domain certain rights, title and interests in their land for public used. |
| Richard DeVillier, et al. v. State of Texas |
|
Houston, Texas eminent domain lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on an inverse condemnation theory. |
| Perry Bonin, et al. Sabine River Authority of Texas, et al. |
|
Beaumont, Texas civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Sabine River Authority of Texas, et al. on inverse condemnation theories. |

