Dr. Marvin Wayne Couch appeals from summary judgment entered in favor
of defendants, Memorial Hospital of Carbon County (“MHCC�), a small rural
hospital where he has staff privileges, the hospital’s chief administrator, and six
of the ten other physicians who have privileges at MHCC. Dr. Couch brought this
action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, to remedy an alleged deprivatio... More...   $0 (11-17-2009 - WY)

Since the entry of a 1993 consent decree, the district court1 has overseen the enforcement of a settlement in an antitrust class action brought by the above-named class members against the National Football League and its member clubs (NFL or League). Throughout that time, the district court has resolved numerous disputes over the terms of the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (settlement agree... More...   $0 (11-16-2009 - )

In this diversity case governed by Kansas tort law, SFX Motor Sports, Inc.1 (“SFXâ€�), appeals the district court’s denial of its post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOLâ€�). SFX argues that a reasonable jury could not have found SFX liable for wanton conduct based on its staging of an August 2003 motorcycle race in which Arthur Wagner, Jr. (“Wagnerâ€�), crashed and was se... More...   $0 (11-13-2009 - KS)

In this case, we consider whether condominium owners can sue their condo association under the Fair Housing Act (FHA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq., for alleged religious and racial discrimination that took place after the owners bought their condo unit. We highlight the word “afterâ€� because based on a prior opinion from this court, Halprin v. Prairie Single Family Homes of Dearborn Park Ass’... More...   $0 (11-13-2009 - IL)

TexVa, Inc. (“TexVaâ€�) and R. Bradley Bierman (“Biermanâ€�) appeal the trial court's order granting the special appearances of Cindy Hayes (“Hayesâ€�) and James Boone (“Booneâ€�), both residents of California. Appellants contend that the trial court erred in sustaining the special appearances of Boone and Hayes. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that Hayes' and Boone's contact... More...   $0 (11-13-2009 - TX)

Is it reversible error to permit a jury to decide a case based on an instruction that is neither supported by the evidence, intended by the trial court, nor properly defined? Because we conclude that it is, we reverse and remand.

FACTUAL SUMMARY

Doris Penrod appeals from a take nothing judgment entered in favor of David R. Schecter, M.D., Individually, and d/b/a Schecter and Blumenf... More...   $0 (11-13-2009 - TX)

Kaiser Eagle Mountain, Inc. (“Kaiserâ€�) seeks to build a landfill on a former Kaiser mining site near Joshua Tree National Park (“Joshua Treeâ€�). As part of its landfill development plan, Kaiser sought to exchange certain private lands for several parcels of land surrounding the mine site and owned by the Bureau of Land Managment (“BLMâ€�). Several parties, including the National Parks Con... More...   $0 (11-11-2009 - CA)

Diane Bond sued the City of Chicago and several members of its police department, claiming that the officers violated her constitutional rights while performing official duties. During discovery, the City turned over voluminous material relating to citizen complaints against its police officers; the information was subject to a protective order that prohibited public disclosure of these confidenti... More...   $0 (11-10-2009 - IL)

Bill Butts ("Bill") and his wife, Debra Butts ("Debra") (collectively "Plaintiffs"), brought claims for personal injury and loss of consortium, respectively, against the Missouri Department of Conservation ("Defendant"), alleging Bill suffered physical injuries when he tripped in the dark over a chain Defendant had negligently placed between two poles. After a jury trial, the trial court accepted ... More...   $0 (11-04-2009 - MO)

Petitioner-appellant Schaghticoke Tribal Nation (the “Schaghticoke�) appeals from an August 27, 2008 judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Peter C. Dorsey, Judge) entered after the District Court granted summary judgment to respondents and intervenor-respondents. Schaghticoke Tribal Nation v. Kempthorne, 587 F. Supp. 2d 389 (D. Conn. 2008).

In 200... More...   $0 (11-04-2009 - CT)

Plaintiffs are the parents of a child removed from them by the state after extensive proceedings resulted in a finding that the best interests of the child required termination of their parental rights. In re G.M., No. PC-05-75 (Me. D. Ct. Jan. 23, 2008). The parents then sued in federal court, asserting violations of statutory and constitutional rights during the termination proceedings and parti... More...   $0 (11-04-2009 - ME)

This case is before this Court upon an appeal from a final order of the Circuit Court of Wyoming County, West Virginia, granting a motion to dismiss filed by the Appellee and Defendant below, the West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways (hereinafter called “DOHâ€�). In that Order, the circuit court concluded that the DOH is entitled to sovereign immunity in this case bec... More...   $0 (11-04-2009 - WV)

In this governmental immunity highway exception case, defendant Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) appeals as of right the trial court’s order denying MDOT summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(7). This case arises out of a single motor vehicle accident in which plaintiff Jerome Plunkett’s wife, decedent Holly Marie Plunkett,1 died after losing control of her vehicle, causing her ve... More...   $0 (11-03-2009 - MI)

Randal McCullough, a participant in a defined-benefit pension plan sponsored and administered by AEGON USA, Inc. (“AEGONâ€�), brought suit under section 502(a)(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISAâ€�), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(2). He alleged that various plan fiduciaries breached their fiduciary duties to the plan and engaged in prohibited transactions in violation of ... More...   $0 (11-03-2009 - IA)

Nancy Kessling sued appellees, Friendswood Independent School District (AF.I.S.D.@) and its superintendent, Patricia Hanks, for various alleged violations of the Texas Open Meetings Act (ATOMA@), Texas Public Information Act (ATPIA@), and Texas Education Code. In two issues on appeal, Kessling contends that the trial court erred in (1) granting summary judgment against her TOMA and TPIA claims, a... More...   $0 (11-03-2009 - TX)

Donna Scroggin was diagnosed with breast cancer eleven years after she began taking estrogen and progestin drugs manufactured by Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Wyeth) and Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. (Upjohn).1 She sued the companies in 2004 for failure to warn of the risk of breast cancer from combination hormone therapy.

The trial was bifurcated, with liability determined first and punitive damage... More...   $0 (11-03-2009 - AR)

The plaintiffs in this special education case, Patrick P., a minor child, and his parents, Rita and Michael P., appeal the District Court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendant, the West Chester Area School District (“Districtâ€�). The plaintiffs made claims under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (“IDEAâ€�), § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and 42 U.S.C. § 1... More...   $0 (11-02-2009 - PA)

This appeal arises from a dispute between a rail carrier and a warehouseman regarding liability for demurrage, i.e., penalties assessed for the undue detention of rail cars. Norfolk Southern Railway Company sued Brampton Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Savannah Re-Load for demurrage accrued over the six month period from March to August 2007. Savannah Re-Load denied liability for the demurrage charges and,... More...   $0 (11-02-2009 - )

This case requires us to delineate, in a quite literal sense, the boundaries of the First Amendment’s protection of speech. In response to concerns about aggressive protests and confrontations at health care facilities providing abortions, the City of Pittsburgh enacted Ordinance No. 49 in December 2005. Pittsburgh, Pa., Code tit. 6, §§ 623.01–623.07. The Ordinance established two different ... More...   $0 (10-30-2009 - PA)

We must decide whether the district court abused its discretion by preliminarily enjoining the enforcement of new rules promulgated by the Washington State Board of Pharmacy (“Boardâ€�) that require pharmacies to deliver lawfully prescribed Federal Drug Administration (“FDAâ€�)–approved medications and prohibit discrimination against patients, on the ground that the rules violate pharmaciesâ... More...   $0 (10-30-2009 - WA)

This appeal arises from a dispute between Gebhardt & Smith LLP (“Gebhardt & Smithâ€�), appellant, and the Maryland Port Administration (“MPAâ€�), appellee, over a lease (“Leaseâ€�) for office space in the Baltimore World Trade Center (“WTCâ€�). The Lease required that the tenant, Gebhardt & Smith, pay to the landlord, the MPA, base rent plus a proportional share of the building’s operati... More...   $0 (10-29-2009 - MD)

The parties to this Lanham Act suit are manufacturers of an oral laxative the chemical name of which is polyethylene glycol 3350. Schering, the plaintiff, sells its version under the trade name “MiraLAX.â€� MiraLAX is an over-the-counter drug. The four defendants sell the generic version of the drug under its chemical name (except that defendants Kremers and Schwarz also use the name “GlycoLax... More...   $0 (10-29-2009 - )

This appeal is the second in continuing litigation by a group of members of the Passamaquoddy Tribe called Nulankeyutmonen Nkihtaqmikon--the phrase means "We Protect the Homeland," and we refer to the group as NN--to challenge a Bureau of Indian Affairs ("BIA") decision; the decision approved a lease of a plot of Passamaquoddy land for the construction and operation of a liquefied natural gas ("LN... More...   $0 (10-29-2009 - ME)

Plaintiffs Joseph P. Donahue (“Donahueâ€�) and Sonoran Scanners, Inc. (“Sonoranâ€�) appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts granting summary judgment to defendant PerkinElmer, Inc. (“PerkinElmerâ€�) on claims for breach of contract and violation of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93A § 11. These claims arise fro... More...   $0 (10-29-2009 - MA)

After an automobile accident with an underinsured motorist, appellant Theresa Leigh sued the other driver, her own automobile insurers, and her insurance agent, Richard Kuenstler Jr. As relevant to this appeal, she alleged that Kuenstler was negligent and acted unconscionably in failing to obtain uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage in an amount at least equal to her primary insurance policy=... More...   $0 (10-27-2009 - )