Wisconsin Forgery Law
<h1> United States of America v. Demarcus Parker </h1>
<font color="red"><b><h2><center><i> Little Rock, Arkansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Receiving A Firearm While Under Felony Information .</font color="red"></b></h2></center></i></i><b><h2><center><i></b> Marion Man Sentenced To 50 Months In Federal Prison For Receiving A Firearm While Under Felony Information </h2></center></i></font color="red"><br> <br> Dema... More...
$0 (04-01-2024 - WI)State of Wisconsin ex rel. Aman Singh v. Paul Kemper, Warden, Racine Correctional Institution
We are presented with both a <br> petition and a cross-petition for review involving the <br> constitutionality of legislation that repealed and modified a <br> law, 2009 Wis. Act 28, that allowed inmates the opportunity to <br> No. 2013AP1724 <br> 2 <br> earn "positive adjustment time," by which inmates could obtain <br> early release from prison.1 <br> ΒΆ2 The constitutionality of two provi... More...
$0 (07-13-2016 - WI)State of Wisconsin v. Larry W. Clark
State of Wisconsin charged Larry W. Clark, age 61, first-degree intentional homicide (murder) in conjunction, hiding a corpse, forgery, misappropriated ID info, and false info on kidnapping/missing persons in conjunction with the shooting death of his mother, Marcella E. Clark, in 2010 and the hiding of her body. <br> <br> Defendant claimed that he accidentally shot his mother. ... More...
$0 (05-03-2013 - WI)Landmark Credit Union v. Lisa Borum
<P>Lisa Borum, pro se, appeals a "Replevin Order for Judgment" (uppercasing omitted) awarded to Landmark Credit Union, and the trial court's order denying her motion for reconsideration. She contends that Landmark never properly perfected the "Motor Vehicle Consumer Simple Interest Installment Sale and Security Agreement" (uppercasing omitted) she executed in April of 2005 giving Landmark a secur... More...
$0 (10-30-2007 - WI)<a href="http://www.wicourts.gov/html/ca/02/02-0987.htm" target="_new=">David Hubbard v. David H. Schwarz</a>
<P>David Hubbard appeals from an order affirming the revocation of his parole. He claims that he was denied due process because he never had a preliminary hearing and the revocation hearing was untimely; there was insufficient evidence to support the revocation determination; and the length of his reincarceration was arbitrary and capricious. We disagree and affirm for the reasons discussed below.... More...
$0 (03-06-2003 - WI)