Virginia FMLA Law

Thomas L. Ford v. Daniel P. Discroll, Secretary of the Army

Richmond, Virginia, pro se Plaintiff, unsuccessfully attempted to present himself without the help of a lawyer on multiple employment-related claims, including claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. Â§Â§ 2000e to 2000e-17, the American with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. Â§Â§ 12101 to 12213, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA),... More...

$0 (09-22-2025 - VA)

Hannah P. v. Daniel Coats, Director of the Office of The Director of National Intelligence McLean, VA

<center> <img width="300" src="http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/images/Newalexandria.jpg"> </center> Appellant Hannah P.1 (“Hannah”), a former employee of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (“Appellee”), asserts that Appellee discriminated against her pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehabilitation Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 701, et seq., and violated the ... More...

$0 (02-20-2019 - VA)

Kelly S. Meadows v. Gala Industries, Incorporated Morelaw Internet Marketing</a> <a href="http://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/recent.asp" target="_new"> National Find A Lawyer Directory</a> 888-354-4529

Roanoke, VA - Kelly S. Meadows sued Gala Industries, Incorporated on a Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) theory.... More...

$0 (05-01-2018 - VA)

Armand Santoro v. Accenture Federal Services, LLC

Dr. Armand Santoro appeals the district court's order granting the motion by Accenture Federal Services, LLC (Accenture) to compel arbitration. Because we agree with the district court that the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank) does not invalidate the arbitration agreement between Accenture and Santoro, we affirm. I. Santoro began his ... More...

$0 (05-05-2014 - VA)

<a href="http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/012077.U.pdf" target="_new">Diane Alexander v. Alcatel, N.A., et al.</a>

This case requires us to decide whether the district court properly granted summary judgment to the defendant employer in a Title VII sexual harassment case. The lower court held that there was no basis on which to impute liability to the employer because its response to the alleged sexual harassment of the plaintiff was both prompt and effective. The district court deemed irrelevant evidence tha... More...

$0 (10-16-2002 - VA)

Rosemary Cromich McDonnell v. Miller Oil Co., inc.

The plaintiff, Ms. McDonnell, sued her former employer, the defendant Miller Oil Co., alleging that the defendant violated the FMLA by failing to reinstate her following her maternity leave. ... More...

$2 (06-20-1997 - VA)

Rosemary Cromish McDonnell v. Miller Oil Co., Inc.

Family and Medical Leve Act of 1993 ("FMLA"), 29 U.S.C. 2601, et seq. Plaintiff sued her former employer alleging that it violated the FMLA by failing to reinstate her following her maternity leave.... More...