Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Thomas Yuncker and Christopher Gutierrez vs. Dodds Logistics, LLC and Keith Dodds; Zurich American Insurance Company

Date: 06-03-2022

Case Number: WD84645

Judge:

Janet Sutton


Martin, C.J. and Lynch, Sp. J.

Court:

MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

On appeal from The Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri

Plaintiff's Attorney: Russell Watters, St. Louis, MO Counsel for Appellant

Timothy Wolf, St. Louis, MO Co-Counsel for Appellant

Lucas Ude, St. Louis, MO Co-Counsel for Appellant

Defendant's Attorney:









Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan



Click Here For The Best St. Louis, MO Personal Injury Lawyer Directory





Tell MoreLaw About Your Litigation Successes and MoreLaw Will Tell the World.



Re: MoreLaw National Jury Verdict and Settlement



Counselor:

MoreLaw collects and publishes civil and criminal litigation information from the state and federal courts nationwide. Publication is free and access to the information is free to the public.




MoreLaw will publish litigation reports submitted by you free of charge




Info@MoreLaw.com - 855-853-4800



Description:

Outcome:
Zurich was not a party to the suit when the May 26, 2021, judgment was entered

and did not become a party to the suit when it filed a post-judgment motion to intervene.



The post-judgment filing of the motion to intervene did not affect the judgment’s

eligibility for appeal under Rule 74.01(a) or its finality for purposes of appeal under Rule 81.05(a) 30 days after the judgment’s entry. Because Zurich is not a party to the suit aggrieved by the judgment, it has no standing to appeal the judgment.

We dismiss the appeal.

Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Thomas Yuncker and Christopher Gutierrez vs. Dodds Logist...?

The outcome was: Zurich was not a party to the suit when the May 26, 2021, judgment was entered and did not become a party to the suit when it filed a post-judgment motion to intervene. The post-judgment filing of the motion to intervene did not affect the judgment’s eligibility for appeal under Rule 74.01(a) or its finality for purposes of appeal under Rule 81.05(a) 30 days after the judgment’s entry. Because Zurich is not a party to the suit aggrieved by the judgment, it has no standing to appeal the judgment. We dismiss the appeal.

Which court heard Thomas Yuncker and Christopher Gutierrez vs. Dodds Logist...?

This case was heard in <center><h4><b> MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS </b> <br> <br> <font color="green"><i>On appeal from The Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri </i></font></center></h4>, MO. The presiding judge was <center><h1> Janet Sutton </h1></center></center> <BR> <center><h4> Martin, C.J. and Lynch, Sp. J. </h4> </center>.

Who were the attorneys in Thomas Yuncker and Christopher Gutierrez vs. Dodds Logist...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Russell Watters, St. Louis, MO Counsel for Appellant Timothy Wolf, St. Louis, MO Co-Counsel for Appellant Lucas Ude, St. Louis, MO Co-Counsel for Appellant. Defendant's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best St. Louis, MO Personal Injury Lawyer Directory Tell MoreLaw About Your Litigation Successes and MoreLaw Will Tell the World. Re: MoreLaw National Jury Verdict and Settlement Counselor: MoreLaw collects and publishes civil and criminal litigation information from the state and federal courts nationwide. Publication is free and access to the information is free to the public. MoreLaw will publish litigation reports submitted by you free of charge Info@MoreLaw.com - 855-853-4800.

When was Thomas Yuncker and Christopher Gutierrez vs. Dodds Logist... decided?

This case was decided on June 3, 2022.