Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
The State of Ohio v. Stphen Coker
Date: 06-12-2025
Case Number: WD-22-054, 2023-Ohio-4339
Judge: Not Available
Court: Court of Common Pleas, Wood County, Ohio
Plaintiff's Attorney: Wood County, Ohio Prosecuting Attorney's Office
Defendant's Attorney: Click Here For The Best Bowling Green Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory
Description:
Bowling Green, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with raping his wife.<br>
<br>
Appellee, Stephen Coker Jr., and S.O. met at a religious conference in Texas in November 2014. The two kept in contact, and about a month after the conference, S.O. visited Coker in Ohio. Prior to that visit, S.O. made it clear to Coker that she would not have sex with him unless they were married. Coker proposed marriage during that visit, and S.O. accepted his proposal. They married approximately four months later, and in 2016, they moved into a home in Rossford. t some point in the marriage after moving to Rossford, Coker began to demand sex more frequently than S.O. wanted to have sex. According to S.O., in Coker's view, she had to submit to having sex with him, regardless of her desire. <br>
<br>
The disagreement over Coker's demands for sex eventually led to the unravelling of their marriage. <br>
<br>
A pattern emerged in which S.O. and Coker would have a "date night," usually on a Saturday, in which they would go out to dinner and then come home to play board games, listen to music, drink alcohol and/or smoke marijuana, and "have sex." S.O. testified that on some of these date nights, she would fall asleep only to be woken up by Coker having nonconsensual sex with her-which she clarified meant vaginal intercourse-or performing nonconsensual oral sex on her. The pattern of unwanted sexual conduct continued for several years. By June 2020, S.O. returned to Texas and pursued a divorce. <br>
<br>
After S.O. left Coker, she obtained a protection order against him and Coker was indicted on three counts of rape. Each count indicated a different period: January 30, 2019 (Count Two); April 1 to September 1, 2019 (Count Three); and January 1 to June 14, 2020 (Count One). <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Appellee, Stephen Coker Jr., and S.O. met at a religious conference in Texas in November 2014. The two kept in contact, and about a month after the conference, S.O. visited Coker in Ohio. Prior to that visit, S.O. made it clear to Coker that she would not have sex with him unless they were married. Coker proposed marriage during that visit, and S.O. accepted his proposal. They married approximately four months later, and in 2016, they moved into a home in Rossford. t some point in the marriage after moving to Rossford, Coker began to demand sex more frequently than S.O. wanted to have sex. According to S.O., in Coker's view, she had to submit to having sex with him, regardless of her desire. <br>
<br>
The disagreement over Coker's demands for sex eventually led to the unravelling of their marriage. <br>
<br>
A pattern emerged in which S.O. and Coker would have a "date night," usually on a Saturday, in which they would go out to dinner and then come home to play board games, listen to music, drink alcohol and/or smoke marijuana, and "have sex." S.O. testified that on some of these date nights, she would fall asleep only to be woken up by Coker having nonconsensual sex with her-which she clarified meant vaginal intercourse-or performing nonconsensual oral sex on her. The pattern of unwanted sexual conduct continued for several years. By June 2020, S.O. returned to Texas and pursued a divorce. <br>
<br>
After S.O. left Coker, she obtained a protection order against him and Coker was indicted on three counts of rape. Each count indicated a different period: January 30, 2019 (Count Two); April 1 to September 1, 2019 (Count Three); and January 1 to June 14, 2020 (Count One). <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of The State of Ohio v. Stphen Coker?
The outcome was: Affirmed
Which court heard The State of Ohio v. Stphen Coker?
This case was heard in Court of Common Pleas, Wood County, Ohio, OH. The presiding judge was Not Available.
Who were the attorneys in The State of Ohio v. Stphen Coker?
Plaintiff's attorney: Wood County, Ohio Prosecuting Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Bowling Green Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.
When was The State of Ohio v. Stphen Coker decided?
This case was decided on June 12, 2025.