Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Hugh and Andrea Lee v. City of Rye
Date: 07-01-2004
Case Number: Unknown
Judge: Unknown
Court: Superior Court, Rockingham County, New Hampshire
Plaintiff's Attorney: Unknown
Defendant's Attorney:
Charles P. Bauer of Ransmeier & Spellman, Concord, New Hampshire
Description:
Inverse comdemnation claim by Hugh and Andrea Lee against the Rye Conservation Commission for creating a trench on their property without just compensation. The defendant excavated 16 acres of salt marsh on the Lee's property without obtaining permission from them to do so. They claimed that the value of their property was reduced as a result of the creating of the trench which limited their access to part of their property. The Lee also claimed that the defendant acted in bad faith when it damaged their property.
Outcome:
Plaintiff's verdict for $111,050.00
Plaintiff's Experts:
Unknown
Defendant's Experts:
Unknown
Comments:
None
About This Case
What was the outcome of Hugh and Andrea Lee v. City of Rye?
The outcome was: Plaintiff's verdict for $111,050.00
Which court heard Hugh and Andrea Lee v. City of Rye?
This case was heard in Superior Court, Rockingham County, New Hampshire, NH. The presiding judge was Unknown.
Who were the attorneys in Hugh and Andrea Lee v. City of Rye?
Plaintiff's attorney: Unknown. Defendant's attorney: Charles P. Bauer of Ransmeier & Spellman, Concord, New Hampshire.
When was Hugh and Andrea Lee v. City of Rye decided?
This case was decided on July 1, 2004.