Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Roland Leo Grenier Sr. v. General Motors and Ford Motor Company
Date: 03-06-2007
Case Number: Unknown
Judge: Unknown
Court: Superior Court, New Castle County, Delaware
Plaintiff's Attorney: Fred Baron of Baron & Budd, Dallas, Texas
Defendant's Attorney: Unknown
Roland Leo Grenier Sr. sued General Motors and Ford Motor Company on a products liability theory claiming that the brake and clutch components manufactured and sold by defendants contained asbestos and caused him to develop asbestosis.
Ford and General Motors denied that any products manufactured and sold by them cause Mr. Grenier's illness.
They claimed that Grenier's exposure to asbestos in his previous work as a school custodian caused his illness.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Roland Leo Grenier Sr. v. General Motors and Ford Motor C...?
The outcome was: Plaintiff's verdict for $2 million with a finding that General Motors was 70% liability and Ford 16% liable and other were 2% liable for the harm suffered.
Which court heard Roland Leo Grenier Sr. v. General Motors and Ford Motor C...?
This case was heard in Superior Court, New Castle County, Delaware, DE. The presiding judge was Unknown.
Who were the attorneys in Roland Leo Grenier Sr. v. General Motors and Ford Motor C...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Fred Baron of Baron & Budd, Dallas, Texas. Defendant's attorney: Unknown.
When was Roland Leo Grenier Sr. v. General Motors and Ford Motor C... decided?
This case was decided on March 6, 2007.