Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
the People of the State of California v. Carl Lapra Pradia, Jr.
Date: 02-11-2025
Case Number: STK-CR-FE-2013-0005395
Judge: Not Available
Court: Superior County, San Joaquin County, California
Plaintiff's Attorney: San Joaquin County, California District Attorney's Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Stockton Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Click Here For The Best Stockton Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Description:
Stockton, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Dfendant charged with first degree robbery (§ 211) and dissuading a witness by force or threat (§ 136.1, subd. (c)(1)).
n 2013, defendant pleaded guilty to first degree robbery (§ 211) and dissuading a witness by force or threat (§ 136.1, subd. (c)(1)). He admitted a firearm use enhancement in connection with the robbery charge. (Former § 12022.53, subd. (b).) The trial court sentenced him to an aggregate 14-year prison term, consisting of the following: the middle term of four years for the robbery plus 10 years for the firearm enhancement, and a concurrent upper term of four years for dissuading a witness.
* * *
Legal issue Is a remand required for resentencing when the trial court fails to hold a hearing under the current statutory requirements following a recommendation by the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation?
Key Phrases Recall and resentencing. Firearm enhancement. Constructive filing doctrine. California Court of Appeals. Habeas corpus petition.
n 2013, defendant pleaded guilty to first degree robbery (§ 211) and dissuading a witness by force or threat (§ 136.1, subd. (c)(1)). He admitted a firearm use enhancement in connection with the robbery charge. (Former § 12022.53, subd. (b).) The trial court sentenced him to an aggregate 14-year prison term, consisting of the following: the middle term of four years for the robbery plus 10 years for the firearm enhancement, and a concurrent upper term of four years for dissuading a witness.
* * *
Legal issue Is a remand required for resentencing when the trial court fails to hold a hearing under the current statutory requirements following a recommendation by the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation?
Key Phrases Recall and resentencing. Firearm enhancement. Constructive filing doctrine. California Court of Appeals. Habeas corpus petition.
Outcome:
Reversed and remanded.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of the People of the State of California v. Carl Lapra Pradi...?
The outcome was: Reversed and remanded.
Which court heard the People of the State of California v. Carl Lapra Pradi...?
This case was heard in Superior County, San Joaquin County, California, CA. The presiding judge was Not Available.
Who were the attorneys in the People of the State of California v. Carl Lapra Pradi...?
Plaintiff's attorney: San Joaquin County, California District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Stockton Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was the People of the State of California v. Carl Lapra Pradi... decided?
This case was decided on February 11, 2025.