Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Courtney Galloway v. Husker Auto Group, LLC
Date: 12-17-2024
Case Number: S-23-899
Judge: Ryan S. Post
Court: District Court, Lancaster County, Nebraska
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Lincoln Employment Law Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney: Cathy S. Trent-Vilim, Eric W. Tiritilli and Carrie McAtee
Description:
Lincoln, Nebraska employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a wrongful discharge theory.
ourtney Galloway sued her employer, Husker Auto Group, LLC (Husker Auto), alleging (1) retaliation in violation of
[318 Neb. 180] the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act (NFEPA)[1] and (2) wrongful discharge under Nebraska's public policy exception to the at-will employment rule. Specifically, Galloway claimed her employment was terminated in retaliation for her role in investigating the alleged fraud of a fellow employee. Galloway also claimed that Husker Auto must have been aware of and benefited from the scheme. The district court ultimately granted summary judgment in favor of Husker Auto, finding no material issue of fact because the alleged unlawful acts were not those of Husker Auto, but those of its employee.
* * *
EMPLOYMENT LAW. RETALIATION UNDER THE NEBRASKA FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICE ACT (NFEPA). The case concerns an employee's claim that she was terminated in retaliation for investigating and reporting a fraudulent scheme within her workplace, raising issues of whether her actions constituted protected conduct under the NFEPA.
EMPLOYMENT LAW. PUBLIC POLICY EXCEPTION TO THE AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT RULE. The case examines whether the termination of the employee, who alleges she was fired for reporting illegal activities, falls under the public policy exception to the at-will employment rule in Nebraska, requiring analysis of whether her discharge contravened public policy.
EMPLOYMENT LAW. SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND BURDEN-SHIFTING ANALYSIS. The court reviews the appropriateness of granting summary judgment, focusing on whether genuine issues of material fact exist regarding the employer's knowledge of illegal activities and the employee's role in reporting them, necessitating the application of a burden-shifting analysis in retaliation and wrongful discharge claims.
Key Phrases Summary judgment. Employment discrimination. Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act. Wrongful discharge. Protected conduct.
ourtney Galloway sued her employer, Husker Auto Group, LLC (Husker Auto), alleging (1) retaliation in violation of
[318 Neb. 180] the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act (NFEPA)[1] and (2) wrongful discharge under Nebraska's public policy exception to the at-will employment rule. Specifically, Galloway claimed her employment was terminated in retaliation for her role in investigating the alleged fraud of a fellow employee. Galloway also claimed that Husker Auto must have been aware of and benefited from the scheme. The district court ultimately granted summary judgment in favor of Husker Auto, finding no material issue of fact because the alleged unlawful acts were not those of Husker Auto, but those of its employee.
* * *
EMPLOYMENT LAW. RETALIATION UNDER THE NEBRASKA FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICE ACT (NFEPA). The case concerns an employee's claim that she was terminated in retaliation for investigating and reporting a fraudulent scheme within her workplace, raising issues of whether her actions constituted protected conduct under the NFEPA.
EMPLOYMENT LAW. PUBLIC POLICY EXCEPTION TO THE AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT RULE. The case examines whether the termination of the employee, who alleges she was fired for reporting illegal activities, falls under the public policy exception to the at-will employment rule in Nebraska, requiring analysis of whether her discharge contravened public policy.
EMPLOYMENT LAW. SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND BURDEN-SHIFTING ANALYSIS. The court reviews the appropriateness of granting summary judgment, focusing on whether genuine issues of material fact exist regarding the employer's knowledge of illegal activities and the employee's role in reporting them, necessitating the application of a burden-shifting analysis in retaliation and wrongful discharge claims.
Key Phrases Summary judgment. Employment discrimination. Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act. Wrongful discharge. Protected conduct.
Outcome:
Reversed and remanded.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Courtney Galloway v. Husker Auto Group, LLC?
The outcome was: Reversed and remanded.
Which court heard Courtney Galloway v. Husker Auto Group, LLC?
This case was heard in District Court, Lancaster County, Nebraska, NE. The presiding judge was Ryan S. Post.
Who were the attorneys in Courtney Galloway v. Husker Auto Group, LLC?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Lincoln Employment Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Cathy S. Trent-Vilim, Eric W. Tiritilli and Carrie McAtee.
When was Courtney Galloway v. Husker Auto Group, LLC decided?
This case was decided on December 17, 2024.