Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Brian C. Frelix v. State of Tennessee

Date: 12-12-2023

Case Number: M2023-00291-CCA-R3-PC

Judge: Robert L. Holloway, Jr

Court: IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE (Davidson County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General and Reporter; G. Kirby May, Assistant Attorney General; Kim R. Helper (at first and second post-conviction hearings), District Attorney General; and Stacey Edmonson1 (at second post-conviction hearing), Deputy District

Attorney General,

Defendant's Attorney: Cayley J. Turrin

Description:

Nashville, Tennessee criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with appealing from the Williamson County Circuit Court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief related to his convictions for four counts of aggravated robbery, four counts of aggravated assault, one count of aggravated burglary, and one count of theft of property

Outcome:

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the post-conviction court is affirmed

Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Brian C. Frelix v. State of Tennessee?

The outcome was: For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the post-conviction court is affirmed

Which court heard Brian C. Frelix v. State of Tennessee?

This case was heard in IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE (Davidson County), TN. The presiding judge was Robert L. Holloway, Jr.

Who were the attorneys in Brian C. Frelix v. State of Tennessee?

Plaintiff's attorney: Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General and Reporter; G. Kirby May, Assistant Attorney General; Kim R. Helper (at first and second post-conviction hearings), District Attorney General; and Stacey Edmonson1 (at second post-conviction hearing), Deputy District Attorney General,. Defendant's attorney: Cayley J. Turrin.

When was Brian C. Frelix v. State of Tennessee decided?

This case was decided on December 12, 2023.