Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Susan Joseph, f/k/a Susan Schrauth v. Eric Schrauth
Date: 03-15-2022
Case Number: ED109631
Judge: Renee D. Hardin-Tammons
Court: Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri
Plaintiff's Attorney: Marshall Hoekel
Defendant's Attorney: Elaine Pudlowski
Description:
St. Louis, Missouri family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce case.
Eric Schrauth ("Ericâ€), the former spouse of Susan Schrauth (n/k/a Susan Joseph) ("Susanâ€),
appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, which granted Susan's
motion to dismiss Eric's motion to modify the parties' negotiated divorce decree. Eric's motion
to modify had requested, inter alia, that the circuit court terminate his current $1,000 monthly
maintenance obligation to Susan based on a purported "substantial and sustained†change in her
circumstances. In his sole point on appeal, Eric argues that the circuit court erred in granting
Susan's motion to dismiss because the divorce decree was ambiguous as written; furthermore,
the applicable maintenance statute—§ 452.335, RSMo—requires that a spousal maintenance
obligation be deemed modifiable absent a specific provision that it is non-modifiable, which he
argues is not included in the parties' divorce decree with respect to his current $1,000 monthly
maintenance obligation.
Eric Schrauth ("Ericâ€), the former spouse of Susan Schrauth (n/k/a Susan Joseph) ("Susanâ€),
appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, which granted Susan's
motion to dismiss Eric's motion to modify the parties' negotiated divorce decree. Eric's motion
to modify had requested, inter alia, that the circuit court terminate his current $1,000 monthly
maintenance obligation to Susan based on a purported "substantial and sustained†change in her
circumstances. In his sole point on appeal, Eric argues that the circuit court erred in granting
Susan's motion to dismiss because the divorce decree was ambiguous as written; furthermore,
the applicable maintenance statute—§ 452.335, RSMo—requires that a spousal maintenance
obligation be deemed modifiable absent a specific provision that it is non-modifiable, which he
argues is not included in the parties' divorce decree with respect to his current $1,000 monthly
maintenance obligation.
Outcome:
The Motion Judgment is affirmed.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Susan Joseph, f/k/a Susan Schrauth v. Eric Schrauth?
The outcome was: The Motion Judgment is affirmed.
Which court heard Susan Joseph, f/k/a Susan Schrauth v. Eric Schrauth?
This case was heard in Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri, MO. The presiding judge was Renee D. Hardin-Tammons.
Who were the attorneys in Susan Joseph, f/k/a Susan Schrauth v. Eric Schrauth?
Plaintiff's attorney: Marshall Hoekel. Defendant's attorney: Elaine Pudlowski.
When was Susan Joseph, f/k/a Susan Schrauth v. Eric Schrauth decided?
This case was decided on March 15, 2022.