Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Michael J. Barbieri vs. Jessica A. Barbieri

Date: 01-25-2022

Case Number: ED108457

Judge: James M. Dowd

Court:

Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District

On appeal from The Circuit Court of St. Louis County

Plaintiff's Attorney: Susan M. Hais and Elliot I. Goldberger

Defendant's Attorney:



St. Louis, MO - Divorce Lawyer Directory



Tell MoreLaw About Your Litigation Successes and MoreLaw Will Tell the World.



Re: MoreLaw National Jury Verdict and Settlement



Counselor:

MoreLaw collects and publishes civil and criminal litigation information from the state and federal courts nationwide. Publication is free and access to the information is free to the public.

MoreLaw will publish litigation reports submitted by you free of charge

Info@MoreLaw.com - 855-853-4800

Description:

St. Louis, Missouri divorce lawyer represented Appellant a judgment dissolving marriage.





Appellant Jessica A. Barbieri (Wife) and Respondent/Cross–Appellant Michael J. Barbieri

(Husband) both appeal the trial court's July 10, 2019 judgment dissolving their marriage. In her

appeal, Wife brings six points of error: (1) That because the trial court failed to rule on the post–

trial motions within 90 days after the last such motion was filed, the judgment became final on

November 7, 2019, whereupon the trial court lost jurisdiction thus rendering its November 12,

2019 amended judgment a nullity; (2) That the trial court abused its discretion by miscalculating

the division of the profits from the sale of the marital home; (3) That the trial court erred in its

findings regarding Wife's squandering of marital assets, subjecting her to the potential for double

liability; (4) That the trial court abused its discretion in connection with the amount of the PDI

distributions she owed Husband; (5) That the trial court abused its discretion in connection with

the length of time Husband owed Wife retroactive child support; and (6) That the judgment's

disposition of certain items of marital property was in conflict with Attachment A to the judgment.

Wife also seeks this Court's order that Husband pay one–half the cost of the transcript for this

appeal pursuant to Rule 81.12(h).

In his cross–appeal, Husband claims the court erred in six instances: (1) In granting any

amount of maintenance to Wife whether current or retroactive; (2) In its computation of the

amount of retroactive child support and in its determination was required to pay any portion of

Daughter's college expenses; (3) In failing to consider several matters, including the testimony

of witness Kevin Meyers, resulting in its erroneous calculation of the amount of Wife's gambling

losses; (4) By deviating from the parties' agreed–upon PDL when calculating the profits of PDI

that were meant to be split evenly between them; (5) In its determinations as to the parties' tax

liability, including its determination that Husband did not have a legitimate claim to "innocent

2

spouse status” in connection with the parties' state tax liability; (6) In ordering Husband to pay

$50,000 of Wife's attorney's fees; and (7) In ordering a 50-50 division of the marital estate when

Wife's egregious marital misconduct warranted a 70-30 division in his favor. The Court has

dismissed Husband's points (2) and (5) as multifarious in violation of Rule 84.04.
Outcome:
Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part with instructions.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Michael J. Barbieri vs. Jessica A. Barbieri?

The outcome was: Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part with instructions.

Which court heard Michael J. Barbieri vs. Jessica A. Barbieri?

This case was heard in <center><h5><b> Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District </b> <br></h5> <font color="green"><i><h4>On appeal from The Circuit Court of St. Louis County </i></font></center></h4>, MO. The presiding judge was James M. Dowd.

Who were the attorneys in Michael J. Barbieri vs. Jessica A. Barbieri?

Plaintiff's attorney: Susan M. Hais and Elliot I. Goldberger. Defendant's attorney: St. Louis, MO - Divorce Lawyer Directory Tell MoreLaw About Your Litigation Successes and MoreLaw Will Tell the World. Re: MoreLaw National Jury Verdict and Settlement Counselor: MoreLaw collects and publishes civil and criminal litigation information from the state and federal courts nationwide. Publication is free and access to the information is free to the public. MoreLaw will publish litigation reports submitted by you free of charge Info@MoreLaw.com - 855-853-4800.

When was Michael J. Barbieri vs. Jessica A. Barbieri decided?

This case was decided on January 25, 2022.