Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

City of Peerless Park v. Dennis

Date: 02-27-2001

Case Number: ED 77974, ED 78010

Judge: Robert G. Dowd

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Plaintiff's Attorney: Charles A. Seigel, III, and Michael A. Wolff, St. Louis, Missouri

Defendant's Attorney: Stanley J. Wallach and Jerome Wallach, St. Louis, Missouri

Description:
The City of Peerless Park (the City) appeals from a judgment apportioning the proceeds of a condemnation award for a parcel of land owned by William E. Dennis (Dennis) and leased to Central Holding Corporation (CHC). Dennis and the City settled their claim for Dennis's portion of the award and Dennis assigned his rights and interests in this matter to the City. The City contends the trial court erred in (1) awarding CHC a portion of the condemnation award based on CHC's unexercised option to purchase the land because that option to purchase is not a property interest, (2) admitting opinion testimony of the value of the option because the opinion was not reasonably reliable, and (3) calculating the compensation because the trial court should have deducted the rent owed for the remaining years of the lease and should have discounted for risk and entrepreneurial profit. CHC cross-appeals contending the trial court erred in (1) calculating the compensation because a discount rate should not have been applied, and (2) failing to award CHC the rental bonus value. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
This appeal is a result of a condemnation proceeding instituted by the City to remedy blight and encourage redevelopment in the area. The affected parcel is 1.5 acres located in a floodplain near the intersection of I-44 and Highway 141. Dennis leased the property to CHC under a ten-year lease dated August 3, 1992. CHC used the lot as seasonal parking for a haunted house.

* * *

Click the case caption above for the full text of the
Court's opinion.

Outcome:
Affirmed in part, and reversed and remanded in part.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Unknown
Defendant's Experts:
Unknown
Comments:
None

About This Case

What was the outcome of City of Peerless Park v. Dennis?

The outcome was: Affirmed in part, and reversed and remanded in part.

Which court heard City of Peerless Park v. Dennis?

This case was heard in Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, MO. The presiding judge was Robert G. Dowd.

Who were the attorneys in City of Peerless Park v. Dennis?

Plaintiff's attorney: Charles A. Seigel, III, and Michael A. Wolff, St. Louis, Missouri. Defendant's attorney: Stanley J. Wallach and Jerome Wallach, St. Louis, Missouri.

When was City of Peerless Park v. Dennis decided?

This case was decided on February 27, 2001.