Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Fred M. Long v. Teresa Carol Long
Date: 12-01-2023
Case Number: DR-21-901026
Judge: Unavailable
Court: Circuit Court, Tuscaloosa County, Alabama
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Tuscaloosa Divorce Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Tuscaloosa Divorce Lawyer Directory
Description:
Tuscaloosa, Alabama family law divorce lawyers represented the parties.
On September 29, 2021, Teresa Carol Long ("the wife") filed in the trial court a complaint for a divorce against the husband. On that same date, the wife filed a Form CS-47 "Domestic Relations/Child-Support Information Sheet," see Rule 32.1, Ala. R. Jud. Admin., that indicated that the husband resided at an address in Tuscaloosa, and the wife completed a summons form indicating that the husband could be served at that Tuscaloosa address. After several attempts to serve the husband at that address failed, on June 24, 2022, the wife filed a motion to extend the time to complete service. In her motion, the wife asserted that the husband was aware of the divorce proceeding but that she had been unable to serve the husband despite having hired a private-process server because, she stated, he had been avoiding service. The wife requested an additional 30 days to serve the husband personally at his place of employment, which she had ascertained to be in Orange Beach. The trial court granted the wife's motion.
Long v. Long, CL-2023-0243 (Ala. Civ. App. Dec 01, 2023)
On September 29, 2021, Teresa Carol Long ("the wife") filed in the trial court a complaint for a divorce against the husband. On that same date, the wife filed a Form CS-47 "Domestic Relations/Child-Support Information Sheet," see Rule 32.1, Ala. R. Jud. Admin., that indicated that the husband resided at an address in Tuscaloosa, and the wife completed a summons form indicating that the husband could be served at that Tuscaloosa address. After several attempts to serve the husband at that address failed, on June 24, 2022, the wife filed a motion to extend the time to complete service. In her motion, the wife asserted that the husband was aware of the divorce proceeding but that she had been unable to serve the husband despite having hired a private-process server because, she stated, he had been avoiding service. The wife requested an additional 30 days to serve the husband personally at his place of employment, which she had ascertained to be in Orange Beach. The trial court granted the wife's motion.
Long v. Long, CL-2023-0243 (Ala. Civ. App. Dec 01, 2023)
Outcome:
Affirmed.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Fred M. Long v. Teresa Carol Long?
The outcome was: Affirmed.
Which court heard Fred M. Long v. Teresa Carol Long?
This case was heard in Circuit Court, Tuscaloosa County, Alabama, AL. The presiding judge was Unavailable.
Who were the attorneys in Fred M. Long v. Teresa Carol Long?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Tuscaloosa Divorce Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Tuscaloosa Divorce Lawyer Directory.
When was Fred M. Long v. Teresa Carol Long decided?
This case was decided on December 1, 2023.