Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Benjamin Filiberto Paz

Date: 12-20-2024

Case Number: DLB-23-2801

Judge: Deborah L. Boardman

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Maryland (Baltimore County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Baltimore

Defendant's Attorney: Click Here For The Best Baltimore Immigration Lawyer Directory

Description:
Baltimore, Maryland immigration lawyer represented the Defendant.<br>
<br>
The United States seeks to denaturalize Benjamin Filiberto Paz, a naturalized U.S. citizen, because it believes Paz illegally obtained citizenship. The government claims that Paz misrepresented on his naturalization application that he had never committed any offense for which he had not been arrested when, in fact, at the time of his application, he had committed the offenses of burglary and sexual assault ten years earlier. Paz was not arrested for those crimes until two years after he became a citizen. Now, the government seeks to revoke Paz's citizenship because it claims Paz committed perjury and related offenses when he submitted his naturalization application and concealed and misrepresented material facts in the naturalization process. <br>
<br>
* * *<br>
<br>
IMMIGRATION LAW. DENATURALIZATION. The case concerns a motion for judgment on the pleadings in a denaturalization proceeding where the United States government sought to revoke the naturalization of the defendant, alleging that he illegally procured citizenship through concealment of past criminal conduct and false statements on his naturalization application.<br>
<br>
CIVIL PROCEDURE. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS. The court addressed the appropriateness of granting a Rule 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings, emphasizing that such motions require clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence without factual disputes, particularly regarding the defendant's intent or state of mind when false statements were allegedly made.<br>
<br>
CRIMINAL LAW. FALSE STATEMENTS. The court evaluated whether the defendant, accused of making false statements under penalty of perjury in his naturalization application, acted willfully or knowingly, denying the government's motion due to insufficient evidence in the pleadings on the defendant's state of mind.<br>
<br>
Key Phrases Denaturalization proceedings. Judgment on the pleadings. Good moral character. Willful misrepresentation. Perjury allegations.
Outcome:
Motion denied.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Benjamin Filiberto Paz?

The outcome was: Motion denied.

Which court heard United States of America v. Benjamin Filiberto Paz?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Maryland (Baltimore County), MD. The presiding judge was Deborah L. Boardman.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Benjamin Filiberto Paz?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Baltimore. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Baltimore Immigration Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Benjamin Filiberto Paz decided?

This case was decided on December 20, 2024.