Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

State of Montana v. Alison Beth Careter-Brueggeman

Date: 09-08-2025

Case Number: DC-23-186

Judge: Jennifer B. Lint

Court: Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Ravalli County, Montana

Plaintiff's Attorney: Ravalli County, Montana District County, Montana

Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best Hamilton Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory





Description:
Hamilton, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with drug possession



On the evening of September 4, 2023, Ravalli County Deputy Sheriff Thomas Hsu pulled over Brueggeman for driving a car with expired registration. The traffic stop was not the result of a random encounter with a law enforcement officer.¶4Earlier that evening, the Ravalli County Dispatch received a call for service, providing drug intelligence about a certain residence. Another Deputy Sheriff spoke to the caller, and the information was relayed to Deputy Hsu. The caller reported activity at a certain residence on Moccasin Trail in Victor, Montana; the caller was not identified by name but spoke with personal knowledge of the events. The caller stated no vehicles had been at the residence for a few days, and suddenly, multiple people in multiple vehicles showed up, then some departed while others remained on the scene. The officers were aware of a report from July 2023 associated with the same residence, which resulted in two arrests for drug activity and numerous follow-up calls.
Outcome:
When determining probable cause, the Montana Supreme Court looks at the totality of the circumstances. Individual activities which might not be out of the ordinary, when combined, might indicate that illegal activity is occurring. State v. Zeimer, 2022MT 96, ¶ 32, 408Mont. 433, 510P.3d 100. When looking at the totality of circumstances, the Deputy lacked probable cause when, at 19:20(7:20 PM), he told Brueggemanher car was being seized.



There was no probable cause.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of State of Montana v. Alison Beth Careter-Brueggeman?

The outcome was: When determining probable cause, the Montana Supreme Court looks at the totality of the circumstances. Individual activities which might not be out of the ordinary, when combined, might indicate that illegal activity is occurring. State v. Zeimer, 2022MT 96, ¶ 32, 408Mont. 433, 510P.3d 100. When looking at the totality of circumstances, the Deputy lacked probable cause when, at 19:20(7:20 PM), he told Brueggemanher car was being seized. There was no probable cause.

Which court heard State of Montana v. Alison Beth Careter-Brueggeman?

This case was heard in Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Ravalli County, Montana, MT. The presiding judge was Jennifer B. Lint.

Who were the attorneys in State of Montana v. Alison Beth Careter-Brueggeman?

Plaintiff's attorney: Ravalli County, Montana District County, Montana. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Hamilton Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.

When was State of Montana v. Alison Beth Careter-Brueggeman decided?

This case was decided on September 8, 2025.