Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Beatty v. Ford Motor Company

Date: 12-05-2002

Case Number: 30622

Judge: Per Curiam

Court: In the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia

Plaintiff's Attorney: "_new">LaVerne Sweeney, Esq., Grafton, West Virginia, Attorney for the Appellant.

Defendant's Attorney: Michael Bonasso, Esq., "_new">William J. Hanna, Esq., "_new">Robert P. Lorea, Esq., Flaherty, Sensabaugh & Bonasso, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, Attorneys for the Appellee.





Description:
On June 9, 1998, appellant and plaintiff below Lincoln L. Beatty was operating a 1996 van manufactured by the appellee and defendant below, Ford Motor Company ("Ford"). While driving the van on an interstate highway, the appellant lost control. The van veered off to the right, struck a guardrail, then crossed the highway and struck a guardrail on the left side of the highway. The van apparently went airborne and landed on top of the left guardrail, and slid some distance. The van ultimately came to rest on top of the guardrail, with three wheels suspended in the air. The appellant asserts that he was injured in the collision.


The appellant stated that he was driving the van at approximately 40 miles per hour when he heard a "metal to metal" noise, and then immediately lost control of the ability to steer the van. He contends that the steering wheel spun through a 3/4 turn, and that the van did not "fishtail" on the highway but turned straight into the guardrail.


The appellant exited the van and discovered that the "drag link," a mechanism which controls the steering of the vehicle, was severely damaged. He contends that the drag link broke due to some inherent manufacturing or design defect by appellee Ford.


Appellee Ford, however, contends that other factors were involved in the appellant's collision. The police accident report reflects that, at the time of the accident, it was raining and the roadway was wet. The police officer who investigated the accident concluded it was caused by the appellant's failure to maintain control of his vehicle and "slippery pavement." Two experts later employed by Ford concluded that the drag link was broken as a result of the impact forces during the accident, and was not a cause of the accident, and also concluded that the appellant's description of the accident and the supposed vehicle movements was inconsistent with the drag link malfunctioning.

* * *

Click the case caption above for the
full text of the Court's opinion.

Outcome:
Affirmed for the Defendant.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Unavailable
Defendant's Experts:
Unavailable
Comments:
C.L.

About This Case

What was the outcome of Beatty v. Ford Motor Company?

The outcome was: Affirmed for the Defendant.

Which court heard Beatty v. Ford Motor Company?

This case was heard in In the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, WV. The presiding judge was Per Curiam.

Who were the attorneys in Beatty v. Ford Motor Company?

Plaintiff's attorney: LaVerne Sweeney, Esq., Grafton, West Virginia, Attorney for the Appellant.. Defendant's attorney: Michael Bonasso, Esq., William J. Hanna, Esq., Robert P. Lorea, Esq., Flaherty, Sensabaugh & Bonasso, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, Attorneys for the Appellee..

When was Beatty v. Ford Motor Company decided?

This case was decided on December 5, 2002.