Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
In the Matter of the Marriage of D.C.G. and B.E.G.
Date: 05-09-2025
Case Number: 40030-1-III
Judge: Not Available
Court: Superior Court, Spokane County, Washington
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Spokane Family Law Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Spokane Family Law Lawyer Directory
Description:
Spokane, Washington family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce.
In 2023, the dissolution court denied Brenda G.'s motion to vacate a 2022 marital dissolution decree that incorporated the property settlement agreement reached between her and her former husband, David. On appeal, Brenda contends the dissolution court, when entering the 2022 dissolution decree, failed to fulfill its duty under RCW 26.09.080 to assess the full extent and value of the parties' property. Brenda also asserts that the dissolution court, in 2023, abused its discretion when denying her motion to vacate the 2022 decree because of David's misrepresentations and nondisclosures leading to the signing of the 2022 agreement.
* * *
Legal issue Did the trial court err in denying a motion to vacate a marital dissolution decree based on allegations of fraud and misrepresentation?
Key Phrases Marital dissolution decree. Property settlement agreement. Fraud and misrepresentation. CR 60(b) motion to vacate. RCW 26.09.080 property allocation.
In 2023, the dissolution court denied Brenda G.'s motion to vacate a 2022 marital dissolution decree that incorporated the property settlement agreement reached between her and her former husband, David. On appeal, Brenda contends the dissolution court, when entering the 2022 dissolution decree, failed to fulfill its duty under RCW 26.09.080 to assess the full extent and value of the parties' property. Brenda also asserts that the dissolution court, in 2023, abused its discretion when denying her motion to vacate the 2022 decree because of David's misrepresentations and nondisclosures leading to the signing of the 2022 agreement.
* * *
Legal issue Did the trial court err in denying a motion to vacate a marital dissolution decree based on allegations of fraud and misrepresentation?
Key Phrases Marital dissolution decree. Property settlement agreement. Fraud and misrepresentation. CR 60(b) motion to vacate. RCW 26.09.080 property allocation.
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of In the Matter of the Marriage of D.C.G. and B.E.G.?
The outcome was: Affirmed
Which court heard In the Matter of the Marriage of D.C.G. and B.E.G.?
This case was heard in Superior Court, Spokane County, Washington, WA. The presiding judge was Not Available.
Who were the attorneys in In the Matter of the Marriage of D.C.G. and B.E.G.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Spokane Family Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Spokane Family Law Lawyer Directory.
When was In the Matter of the Marriage of D.C.G. and B.E.G. decided?
This case was decided on May 9, 2025.