Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Lamara Allen Thompson

Date: 02-10-2025

Case Number: 19-CR-5000

Judge: Benjamin H. Settle

Court: United States District Court for the Western District Washington (King County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Seattle

Defendant's Attorney:





Click Here For The Best Seattle Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory





Description:
Seattle, Washington criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with production of child pornography.



An individual convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) for production of child pornography is subject to a mandatory

term of imprisonment of at least 15 years. Under 18 U.S.C. § 2251(e), that mandatory term is increased to at least 25

years if that individual "has one prior conviction ... under the laws of any State relating to aggravated sexual abuse, sexual abuse, [or] abusive sexual contact involving a minor or ward.”



* * *



Lamar Allen Thompson ("Thompson”) was convicted for production and possession of child

pornography. He now challenges the 28-year term of imprisonment that the district court imposed for his

convictions. First, Thompson contends that a 2016 Washington child molestation conviction should not have

triggered a 10-year increase to his mandatory minimum sentence. We disagree and hold that the Washington statute

under which Thompson was convicted is either a categorical match to, or at least relates to, the predicate generic offenses in 18 U.S.C. § 2251(e), thus triggering the increase. Second, Thompson argues that the district court erred by declining to recommend whether Thompson should serve his federal sentence concurrently with certain anticipated state

sentences. But because Thompson did not make this argument in the district court, we must apply plain error review. And we conclude that the district court's decision not to make any recommendation was not plain error.
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Lamara Allen Thompson?

The outcome was: Affirmed

Which court heard United States of America v. Lamara Allen Thompson?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Western District Washington (King County), WA. The presiding judge was Benjamin H. Settle.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Lamara Allen Thompson?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Seattle. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Seattle Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Lamara Allen Thompson decided?

This case was decided on February 10, 2025.