Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Karl Beidler v. Timberline High School
Date: 07-18-2000
Case Number: 99-2-00236-6
Judge: Thomas McPhee
Court: Superior Court, Thurston County, Washington
Plaintiff's Attorney: Aaron Caplan,American Civil Liberties Union of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Defendant's Attorney: Michael Tierney
Karl Beidler, then a 17-year-old junior at Timberline High School, created the Web site parody on January 21, 1999. It included a disclaimer that "…everything on it has been created out of my imagination or someone I know’s imagination" and that "… all pictures are parody pictures …" On January 29 school authorities expelled Karl from Timberline on an "emergency" basis because of his Internet satire. District officials claimed their action was based on an emergency, yet no evidence has been given of anything remotely resembling an emergency. His parents decided to take the Web site off the Internet that night. On February 2 the principal informed Karl and his parents that the student was suspended for the rest of the school year – for "exceptional misconduct." After missing a month of classes, Karl was allowed to enroll in an alternative school in the District. This year he again attended school at Timberline and graduated.
In his ruling Judge McPhee made clear that free speech rights apply to speech on the Internet, saying, "Today the First Amendment protects students’ speech to the same extent as in 1979 or 1969, when the U.S. Supreme Court decided Tinker v. Des Moines." In that case, the high court issued a landmark ruling that, "Students do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate."
Judge McPhee ordered that a trial be held to determine damages for North Thurston School District’s unlawful imposition of discipline. ACLU cooperating attorney Robert Hedrick is representing the Beidlers.
E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to info@morelaw.com.
Report your litigation success to MoreLaw at www.morelaw.com/verdicts/addverdicts.asp.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Karl Beidler v. Timberline High School?
The outcome was: Judgment in favor of plaintiff holding that public school officials cannot punish a student for free speech outside of school. In his ruling Judge McPhee made clear that free speech rights apply to speech on the Internet, saying, "Today the First Amendment protects students’ speech to the same extent as in 1979 or 1969, when the U.S. Supreme Court decided Tinker v. Des Moines." In that case, the high court issued a landmark ruling that, "Students do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." Judge McPhee ordered that a trial be held to determine damages for North Thurston School District’s unlawful imposition of discipline. ACLU cooperating attorney Robert Hedrick is representing the Beidlers.
Which court heard Karl Beidler v. Timberline High School?
This case was heard in Superior Court, Thurston County, Washington, WA. The presiding judge was Thomas McPhee.
Who were the attorneys in Karl Beidler v. Timberline High School?
Plaintiff's attorney: Aaron Caplan,American Civil Liberties Union of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Defendant's attorney: Michael Tierney.
When was Karl Beidler v. Timberline High School decided?
This case was decided on July 18, 2000.