Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Anthony Kelly v. The City of Alexandria

Date: 12-31-2025

Case Number: 19-cv-00985

Judge: Claude M. Hilton

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Fairfax County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: <center><h2><a href="https://www.morelaw.com/virginia/lawyers/alexandria/criminal_defense.asp"target="_new"><h2>Click Here For The Best Alexandria Employment Law Lawyer Directory</h2></a></font> </h2></center>

Defendant's Attorney: Click Here For The Best Alexandria Commercial Litigation Lawyer Directory

Description:
Alexandria, Virginia employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Fair Labor Standards Act violation theory.

The Plaintiffs, Current and former battalion chiefs for the City of Alexandria Fire Department, sued the City seeking payment of unpaid overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201–19, requires employers to pay non-
exempt employees time-and-a-half when they work more than 40 hours in a week or—for fire protection employees with 28-day work periods (as here)—more than 212 hours in 28 days. Id. § 207(a)(1), (k); 29 C.F.R. § 553.201(a). Department of Labor regulations exempt “highly compensated employees” from this time-and-a-half overtime-pay requirement. 29 C.F.R. § 541.601(a); 29 U.S.C. § 213(a)(7). But the exemption applies only to employees who are paid on a salary basis. 29 C.F.R. § 541.601(b)(1); Helix Energy Sols. Grp., Inc. v. Hewitt, 598 U.S. 39, 44–45 (2023).

602(a) applies to employees paid on a weekly (or less frequent) basis. Helix, 598
U.S. at 56–57. They are paid on a salary basis when they receive “at least part of [their] compensation through a preset weekly (or less frequent) salary” that isn’t “subject to reduction because of exactly how [much they] worked.” Id. at 46.
604(b) applies to employees paid on an hourly, daily, or shift basis. Id. at 56–57.
They too are paid on a salary basis if the employer guarantees “the employee at least $455 each week (the minimum salary level), regardless of the number of hours, days or shifts worked,” and the guarantee is “roughly equivalent to [their] usual earnings at the assigned hourly, daily or shift rate for [their] normal scheduled workweek.” Id. at 47 (quoting 29 C.F.R. § 541.604(b)).
Outcome:
The district court granted summary judgment for the City, concluding that the chiefs were exempt from the Act’s overtime-pay requirements under the “highly compensated employee” exemption.

Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Anthony Kelly v. The City of Alexandria?

The outcome was: The district court granted summary judgment for the City, concluding that the chiefs were exempt from the Act’s overtime-pay requirements under the “highly compensated employee” exemption. Affirmed

Which court heard Anthony Kelly v. The City of Alexandria?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Fairfax County), va. The presiding judge was Claude M. Hilton.

Who were the attorneys in Anthony Kelly v. The City of Alexandria?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Alexandria Employment Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Alexandria Commercial Litigation Lawyer Directory.

When was Anthony Kelly v. The City of Alexandria decided?

This case was decided on December 31, 2025.