Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Darrell J. Austin, Jr. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Date: 08-04-2025

Case Number: 22-CV-707

Judge: Robert E. Payne

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Henrico County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: <center><h2><a href="https://www.morelaw.com/virginia/lawyers/richmond/consumer_law.asp"target="_new"><h2>Click Here For The Best Richmond Consumer Law Lawyer Directory</h2></a></font><br> </h2></center><br>

Defendant's Attorney: Click Here For The Best Richmond Insurance Defense Law Lawyer Directory

Description:
Richmond, Virginia consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theory.<br>
<br>
Parties sometimes agree to resolve disputes between them in private arbitration instead of litigating in state or federal court. The Federal Arbitration Act requires courts to honor such an agreement when a party seeks to enforce it, so long as a binding contract to arbitrate the dispute was formed. See 9 U.S.C. § 2. This appeal requires us to consider whether the district court erred when it denied Defendant-Appellant Experian's motion to compel arbitration and excluded evidence offered in support of its motion after Darrell Austin sued the company alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.<br>
<br>
* * *<br>
<br>
9 USC § 2: Validity, irrevocability, and enforcement of agreements to arbitrate<br>
<br>
9 U.S.C. § 2 is a section of the United States Code, Title 9, titled "Arbitration," and specifically falls under Chapter <br>
1: "General Provisions". <br>
<br>
This section states that a written provision in certain agreements to settle future or existing controversies through arbitration shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable. This applies to written provisions in maritime transactions or contracts involving commerce. However, this enforceability is subject to exceptions that exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract, or as provided in chapter 4. <br>
<br>
In essence, 9 U.S.C. § 2 creates a strong presumption in favor of enforcing arbitration agreements in maritime and commerce-related contracts, unless valid grounds for revocation exist under contract law or chapter 4 of the Act. <br>
Key aspects include the requirement for a written agreement, the scope limited to maritime transactions or transactions involving commerce, coverage of both future and existing controversies, emphasis on enforceability, and the presence of exceptions. <br>
<br>
This section is a fundamental part of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), supporting arbitration as a dispute resolution method and ensuring arbitration agreements are treated comparably to other contracts. <br>
<br>
AI responses may include mistakes. For legal advice, consult a professional. Learn more<br>
ving disputes. <br>
Outcome:
Reversed and remanded.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Darrell J. Austin, Jr. v. Experian Information Solutions,...?

The outcome was: Reversed and remanded.

Which court heard Darrell J. Austin, Jr. v. Experian Information Solutions,...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Henrico County), VA. The presiding judge was Robert E. Payne.

Who were the attorneys in Darrell J. Austin, Jr. v. Experian Information Solutions,...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Richmond Consumer Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Richmond Insurance Defense Law Lawyer Directory.

When was Darrell J. Austin, Jr. v. Experian Information Solutions,... decided?

This case was decided on August 4, 2025.