Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Vivant Smart Home, Inc.
Date: 01-07-2021
Case Number:
Judge:
Court: United States District Court for the District of Utah (Salt Lake County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office, Salt Lake City, Utah
Defendant's Attorney:
Salt Lake City, Utah Lawyer Directory
OR
Just Call 855-853-4800 for Free Help Finding a Lawyer to Help You.
Salt Lake City, Utah Lawyer Directory
OR
Just Call 855-853-4800 for Free Help Finding a Lawyer to Help You.
MoreLaw Marketing
Cost Effective Internet Marketing for Legal Professionals
Info@MoreLaw.com - 855-853-4800
Vivint is a provider of smart home monitoring services and frequently obtains new customers through door-to-door sales by Vivint sales representatives. The United States contended that, from 2017 to 2020, certain Vivint sales representatives used their personal funds to cover the cost of initial financing payments on behalf of Vivint customers who sought financing to purchase Vivint's products, while making false and misleading statements to the federally insured financial institution providing the financing that made it appear as if the borrowers had funded the initial payments.
"Making false statements about the creditworthiness of borrowers undermines the integrity of our banking system and puts at risk the taxpayer dollars that help to support it,†said Acting Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Bossert Clark of the Justice Department's Civil Division. "We will pursue those who fail to provide truthful information needed by federally insured financial institutions to make appropriate lending decisions.â€
"American business should be based on truthful disclosures, and false and misleading statements should never be part of dealings with federally insured financial institutions,†said U.S. Attorney John W. Huber for the District of Utah. "This resolution should send a strong message to corporations that using fraudulent tactics to secure consumer sales will not be tolerated.â€
The allegations resolved by the settlement were initially provided to the United States in a declaration submitted under the Financial Institutions Anti-Fraud Enforcement Act, which provides for rewards to eligible declarants who provide information about potential FIRREA violations. The declarant's share of the recovery in this matter has not yet been determined.
This matter was investigated by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Utah and the Civil Division's Commercial Litigation Branch (Fraud Section). Investigative assistance was provided by the FBI.
The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability.
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Vivant Smart Home, Inc.?
The outcome was: Vivint agreed to pay $3.2 million to settle the claims made against it. The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability.
Which court heard United States of America v. Vivant Smart Home, Inc.?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Utah (Salt Lake County), UT.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Vivant Smart Home, Inc.?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office, Salt Lake City, Utah. Defendant's attorney: Salt Lake City, Utah Lawyer Directory OR Just Call 855-853-4800 for Free Help Finding a Lawyer to Help You. MoreLaw Marketing Cost Effective Internet Marketing for Legal Professionals Info@MoreLaw.com - 855-853-4800.
When was United States of America v. Vivant Smart Home, Inc. decided?
This case was decided on January 7, 2021.