Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Richard Holeman, E.W. Chesshire, John Wilke, Joe Gemza, Dan Frankhouser, Eugene Yates and L.T. Bradt v. Landmark Chevrolet Corporation and Bill Heard Chevrolet Corporation

Date: 01-28-1999

Case Number: 14-96-227-CV

Judge: Charles Dickerson

Court: 240th District Court, Fort Bend County, Texas

Plaintiff's Attorney: Joe Alfred Izen, Jr., Richmond, Texas and L.T. Bradt, Houston, Texas

Defendant's Attorney: Robert P. Gaddis,
Roger A. Rider,
R. Tate of Gaddis & Associates, Houston, Texas

Description:
Deceptive Trade Practice Act Claims by several customers of defendants.


Landmark Chevrolet ran an advertisement on a radio station
that, among other things, stated all offers would be accepted and
that new trucks would be sacrificed, "regardless of loss."
Appellants went to Landmark Chevrolet and made offers to purchase
vehicles for amounts ranging from $50.00-200.00. Landmark refused
these offers. Landmark subsequently ran a corrected
advertisement, deleting the "all offers will be accepted"
language. Landmark also ran a retraction of the original ad. In
October 1991, appellants filed this lawsuit.


Several years later, Bill Heard Chevrolet ran a radio
advertisement that included language, "[e]very deal will be
accepted regardless of profit or loss." Appellant Bradt went to
Bill Heard Chevrolet and handed the new car salesman, Al Cruz, a
written "offer" to buy eight different vehicles for $100.00 each.
The offer was refused. Bill Heard subsequently ran a retraction
of the advertisement stating, "The sentence `all offers would be
accepted, regardless of profit or loss' should have read `all
reasonable offers will be accepted regardless of profit or
loss'." Bill Heard was subsequently added as a defendant to the
Landmark suit.

Outcome:
Defendants' verdict.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Unknown
Defendant's Experts:
Unknown
Comments:
Affirmed by the Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston. See: 989 S.W.2d 395 (Tex.App. - Houston [14th Dist.] 1999). Note: The date shown above is the date of the appellate court decision and not the trial date.

About This Case

What was the outcome of Richard Holeman, E.W. Chesshire, John Wilke, Joe Gemza, D...?

The outcome was: Defendants' verdict.

Which court heard Richard Holeman, E.W. Chesshire, John Wilke, Joe Gemza, D...?

This case was heard in 240th District Court, Fort Bend County, Texas, TX. The presiding judge was Charles Dickerson.

Who were the attorneys in Richard Holeman, E.W. Chesshire, John Wilke, Joe Gemza, D...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Joe Alfred Izen, Jr., Richmond, Texas and L.T. Bradt, Houston, Texas. Defendant's attorney: Robert P. Gaddis, Roger A. Rider, R. Tate of Gaddis & Associates, Houston, Texas.

When was Richard Holeman, E.W. Chesshire, John Wilke, Joe Gemza, D... decided?

This case was decided on January 28, 1999.