Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Jose J. Rodriguez v. Norma Rodriguez

Date: 08-15-2013

Case Number: 02-12-00422-CV

Judge: Per Curiam

Court: Texas Court of Appeals, Second District on appeal from the 233rd District Court of Tarrant County

Plaintiff's Attorney: David C. Cowden for Jose J. Rodriguez

Defendant's Attorney: D. Lee Thomas, Jr. and Andrew L. Vogel

Description:
On November 5, 2012, the court ordered that this appeal be referred to mediation and abated pending the mediation. The parties have filed a "Joint Motion to Set Aside the Judgment and For Remand,” in which they state that they have "fully and finally resolved all issues in controversy and have fully and finally compromised and settled this case.” We have considered the parties'

______________________

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2

motion, and it is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, we reinstate this appeal, set aside the trial court's July 18, 2012 Final Decree of Divorce without regard to the merits, and remand this cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with parties' settlement agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
Outcome:
Reversed and remanded
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Jose J. Rodriguez v. Norma Rodriguez?

The outcome was: Reversed and remanded

Which court heard Jose J. Rodriguez v. Norma Rodriguez?

This case was heard in Texas Court of Appeals, Second District on appeal from the 233rd District Court of Tarrant County, TX. The presiding judge was Per Curiam.

Who were the attorneys in Jose J. Rodriguez v. Norma Rodriguez?

Plaintiff's attorney: David C. Cowden for Jose J. Rodriguez. Defendant's attorney: D. Lee Thomas, Jr. and Andrew L. Vogel.

When was Jose J. Rodriguez v. Norma Rodriguez decided?

This case was decided on August 15, 2013.