Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., LP

Date: 01-23-2026

Case Number: 25-cv-01001

Judge: Sam A. Lindsay

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Dallas County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States Department of Justice

Defendant's Attorney: George M. Kryder , Jason J. Fleischer, William S. Scherman

Description:
Dallas, Texas commercial litigation lawyers George M. Kryder , Jason J. Fleischer, and William S. Scherman represented the Defendant charged with violatiing federal pipeline safety regulations.

The government alleged that Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., LP (“PEPL”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Texas-based Energy Transfer, LP. and PEPL violated pipeline safety regulations requiring it to follow its manual of written procedures for conducting operations and maintenance activities in four areas in connection with a fatal incident at the company’s Borchers Station near Meade, Kansas in March 2020. As alleged in the complaint, PEPL’s violations caused a pipeline cleaning pig to be ejected from a partially-pressurized receiver barrel during maintenance activities at the station, which struck and ultimately killed a PEPL employee. A pipeline cleaning pig is an industry term for a cylindrical object that travels through the pipeline, removing deposits and contaminants like scale or rust.

“This settlement reflects our commitment to impose accountability in regulatory matters,” said United States Attorney Ryan Raybould. “The outcome here illustrates the importance and necessity of compliance and appropriate enforcement actions to prevent and address tragic circumstances such as those alleged in this case.”

“Safety and enforcement go hand in hand,” said PHMSA Administrator Paul Roberti. “The complaint alleged that the company’s failure to follow the rules led to an employee’s death. We will not let operators escape accountability in cases like this one and will continue to take whatever steps are necessary to ensure our nation’s energy infrastructure is safe.”

Per the terms of a civil settlement executed with the Department of Justice on December 31, 2025, PEPL agreed to pay the United States $1.425 million to resolve the allegations in the complaint. The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only. There has been no determination or admission of liability.

This pipeline safety enforcement case was investigated and handled by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration before it was referred to the Department of Justice for resolution. Assistant U.S. Attorney Saurabh Sharad of the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Texas handled this matter on behalf of the Department of Justice.
Outcome:
Settled for $1.425 million.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line C...?

The outcome was: Settled for $1.425 million.

Which court heard United States of America v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line C...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Dallas County), Tx. The presiding judge was Sam A. Lindsay.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line C...?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States Department of Justice. Defendant's attorney: George M. Kryder , Jason J. Fleischer, William S. Scherman.

When was United States of America v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line C... decided?

This case was decided on January 23, 2026.