Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Nathan Crewford v. West Texas A&M University

Date: 07-03-2025

Case Number: 23-cv-00152

Judge: Matthew J. Kacsmaryk

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Potter County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Kyle Carney

Defendant's Attorney: James Joyces and Drew Harris

Description:
Amarillo, Texas employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a job discrimination theory.



* * *



42 U.S.C. 2000e, part of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. This law applies to employers, employment agencies, and labor unions, making it illegal to discriminate in hiring, firing, compensation, and other terms and conditions of employment. It also prohibits retaliation against those who oppose discriminatory practices or participate in discrimination investigations.

Specifically, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2 outlines unlawful employment practices, including:



Discrimination in hiring and firing:



Employers cannot refuse to hire or fire individuals based on protected characteristics.



Discrimination in compensation and other terms of employment:



Employers cannot discriminate in pay, benefits, job assignments, promotions, or any other aspect of the employment relationship based on protected characteristics.



Discrimination by employment agencies:



Employment agencies cannot discriminate in referrals or classifications based on protected characteristics.



Retaliation:



Employers cannot retaliate against employees for opposing discriminatory practices or participating in investigations.



Discriminatory job advertisements:



It is illegal to publish job advertisements that indicate a preference based on protected characteristics, with narrow exceptions for religion, sex, or national origin when it is a bona fide occupational qualification.



Essentially, 42 U.S.C. 2000e aims to ensure equal opportunities in the workplace and prevent unfair treatment based on an individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

Outcome:
Judgment in favor of the Defendant.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Nathan Crewford v. West Texas A&M University?

The outcome was: Judgment in favor of the Defendant.

Which court heard Nathan Crewford v. West Texas A&M University?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Potter County), TX. The presiding judge was Matthew J. Kacsmaryk.

Who were the attorneys in Nathan Crewford v. West Texas A&M University?

Plaintiff's attorney: Kyle Carney. Defendant's attorney: James Joyces and Drew Harris.

When was Nathan Crewford v. West Texas A&M University decided?

This case was decided on July 3, 2025.