Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
The State of Texas v. Thomas Albert Pearl, III
Date: 11-01-2024
Case Number: CF-21-3972
Judge: Don R. Burgess
Court: 22nd District Court, Hays County, Texas
Plaintiff's Attorney: Hays County, Texas District Attorney's Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best San Marcos Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Description:
San Marcos, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with
aggravated assault with a deadly weapon (a knife) and with evading arrest with a previous conviction for that offense, and the indictment included enhancement allegations for the two offenses. See Tex. Penal Code §§ 12.42, .425, 22.01(a)(2), .02(a)(2), 38.04(a), (b)(1). Following a jury trial, the jury convicted Pearl of the two offenses, found the enhancement allegations true, and sentenced Pearl to forty years' imprisonment for the assault charge and to ten years' imprisonment for the charge of evading arrest. The trial court rendered its judgments of conviction consistent with the jury's verdicts. On appeal, Pearl contends that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support his conviction for aggravated assault. We will affirm the trial court's judgment of conviction for aggravated assault and leave undisturbed the conviction for evading arrest.
Pearl v. State, 03-23-00339-CR (Tex. App. Nov 01, 2024)
aggravated assault with a deadly weapon (a knife) and with evading arrest with a previous conviction for that offense, and the indictment included enhancement allegations for the two offenses. See Tex. Penal Code §§ 12.42, .425, 22.01(a)(2), .02(a)(2), 38.04(a), (b)(1). Following a jury trial, the jury convicted Pearl of the two offenses, found the enhancement allegations true, and sentenced Pearl to forty years' imprisonment for the assault charge and to ten years' imprisonment for the charge of evading arrest. The trial court rendered its judgments of conviction consistent with the jury's verdicts. On appeal, Pearl contends that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support his conviction for aggravated assault. We will affirm the trial court's judgment of conviction for aggravated assault and leave undisturbed the conviction for evading arrest.
Pearl v. State, 03-23-00339-CR (Tex. App. Nov 01, 2024)
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of The State of Texas v. Thomas Albert Pearl, III?
The outcome was: Affirmed
Which court heard The State of Texas v. Thomas Albert Pearl, III?
This case was heard in 22nd District Court, Hays County, Texas, TX. The presiding judge was Don R. Burgess.
Who were the attorneys in The State of Texas v. Thomas Albert Pearl, III?
Plaintiff's attorney: Hays County, Texas District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best San Marcos Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was The State of Texas v. Thomas Albert Pearl, III decided?
This case was decided on November 1, 2024.