Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Tony Dinwiddie v. Margaret Danielle Pottin and Jennifer Ann Francis
Date: 05-21-2022
Case Number: 03-21-00501-CV
Judge:
Darlene Byrne
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly Dissenting Opinion by Justice Triana
Court:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
On appeal from The 169th District Court of Bell County
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Tell MoreLaw About Your Litigation Successes and MoreLaw Will Tell the World.
Re: MoreLaw National Jury Verdict and Settlement
Counselor:
MoreLaw collects and publishes civil and criminal litigation information from the state and federal courts nationwide. Publication is free and access to the information is free to the public.
MoreLaw will publish litigation reports submitted by you free of charge
Info@MoreLaw.com - 855-853-4800
Defendant's Attorney: Mr. Ivan M. Friedman
subsection (K) due to Dinwiddie’s execution of his affidavit of relinquishment and in finding that termination was in K.J.’s best interest. We need not consider Dinwiddie’s remaining issues, which challenge the court’s finding of grounds under subsections (B) and (C). See Spurck v. Texas Dep’t of Fam. & Protective Servs., 396 S.W.3d 205, 222 (Tex. App.—Austin 2013, no pet.) (“Having determined that the evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s finding on one
of the statutory grounds, we need not consider whether the evidence would support other grounds for termination.â€). We affirm the trial court’s order of termination and adoption.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Tony Dinwiddie v. Margaret Danielle Pottin and Jennifer A...?
The outcome was: We hold that the trial court did not err in basing its termination order on subsection (K) due to Dinwiddie’s execution of his affidavit of relinquishment and in finding that termination was in K.J.’s best interest. We need not consider Dinwiddie’s remaining issues, which challenge the court’s finding of grounds under subsections (B) and (C). See Spurck v. Texas Dep’t of Fam. & Protective Servs., 396 S.W.3d 205, 222 (Tex. App.—Austin 2013, no pet.) (“Having determined that the evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s finding on one of the statutory grounds, we need not consider whether the evidence would support other grounds for termination.â€). We affirm the trial court’s order of termination and adoption.
Which court heard Tony Dinwiddie v. Margaret Danielle Pottin and Jennifer A...?
This case was heard in <center><h4><b> TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN </b> <br> <br> <font color="green"><i>On appeal from The 169th District Court of Bell County </i></font></center></h4>, TX. The presiding judge was <center><h1> Darlene Byrne </h1></center></center> <BR> <center><h2>Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly Dissenting Opinion by Justice Triana </h2> </center>.
Who were the attorneys in Tony Dinwiddie v. Margaret Danielle Pottin and Jennifer A...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Austin, Texas Parental Rights Lawyer Directory Tell MoreLaw About Your Litigation Successes and MoreLaw Will Tell the World. Re: MoreLaw National Jury Verdict and Settlement Counselor: MoreLaw collects and publishes civil and criminal litigation information from the state and federal courts nationwide. Publication is free and access to the information is free to the public. MoreLaw will publish litigation reports submitted by you free of charge Info@MoreLaw.com - 855-853-4800. Defendant's attorney: Mr. Ivan M. Friedman.
When was Tony Dinwiddie v. Margaret Danielle Pottin and Jennifer A... decided?
This case was decided on May 21, 2022.