Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

In re Robert Fields

Date: 04-22-2021

Case Number: 10-21-00066-CR

Judge: PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Davis

Court: IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Plaintiff's Attorney: None Listed

Defendant's Attorney:

Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory



Description:

Waco, Texas - Criminal defense attorney represented Robert Fields with a petition for writ of mandamus





Relator's petition for writ of mandamus, filed on March 23, 2021, is denied.1

Relator also presented within his petition a motion for leave to file his petition for

writ of mandamus. A motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus is required

when relief by mandamus is sought from the Court of Criminal Appeals. TEX. R. APP. P.

72.1. The requirement for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus at the court of

appeals level was eliminated in 1997. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52, Notes and Comments. Thus,

under the applicable rules, if mandamus relief is sought from an intermediate court of

appeals, such as the Tenth Court of Appeals, a motion for leave to file the petition is

unnecessary. The petition was filed without regard to the motion for leave to file it.
Outcome:
Accordingly, the motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of In re Robert Fields?

The outcome was: Accordingly, the motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot.

Which court heard In re Robert Fields?

This case was heard in IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS, TX. The presiding judge was PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Davis.

Who were the attorneys in In re Robert Fields?

Plaintiff's attorney: None Listed. Defendant's attorney: Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.

When was In re Robert Fields decided?

This case was decided on April 22, 2021.