Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Larry Darnell Blaylock v. The State of Texas
Date: 03-16-2020
Case Number: No. 07-20-00059-CR No. 07-20-00060-CR
Judge: Per Curiam
Court: Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
Plaintiff's Attorney: Rickie R. Redman
Defendant's Attorney:
Need help finding a lawyer for representation for filing notices of appeal challenging convictions in Texas?
Call 918-582-6422. It's Free.
Description:
Pursuant to plea bargain agreements, appellant Larry Darnell Blaylock was
convicted of two counts of manufacture or delivery of a controlled substance.1
He was
sentenced to twenty years’ confinement in trial court cause number DCR-5894-19 and to
twenty-five years’ confinement in cause number DCR-5962-19, with the sentences to run
concurrently. The trial court’s certifications of appellant’s right of appeal reflect that
1 TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.112(d) (West 2017).
2
appellant’s cases are plea-bargain cases with no right of appeal and that appellant has
waived the right of appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). Notwithstanding the
certifications, appellant filed notices of appeal challenging his convictions.
We are required by Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) to dismiss an appeal “if a
certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of
the record . . . .” By letter of January 28, 2020, we notified appellant of the consequences
of the certifications and invited him to file amended certifications showing a right of appeal
or demonstrate other grounds for continuing the appeals by February 7. Appellant has
not responded to the Court’s letter to date.
MoreLaw Suites
MoreLaw Suites
Virtual Offices of Solo Practice Lawyers Starting at $200 a Month
Office With MoreLaw Suites and Reduce Your Overhead
918-582-3993 - Info@MoreLaw.com
Pursuant to plea bargain agreements, appellant Larry Darnell Blaylock was
convicted of two counts of manufacture or delivery of a controlled substance.1
He was
sentenced to twenty years’ confinement in trial court cause number DCR-5894-19 and to
twenty-five years’ confinement in cause number DCR-5962-19, with the sentences to run
concurrently. The trial court’s certifications of appellant’s right of appeal reflect that
1 TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.112(d) (West 2017).
2
appellant’s cases are plea-bargain cases with no right of appeal and that appellant has
waived the right of appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). Notwithstanding the
certifications, appellant filed notices of appeal challenging his convictions.
We are required by Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) to dismiss an appeal “if a
certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of
the record . . . .” By letter of January 28, 2020, we notified appellant of the consequences
of the certifications and invited him to file amended certifications showing a right of appeal
or demonstrate other grounds for continuing the appeals by February 7. Appellant has
not responded to the Court’s letter to date.
Outcome:
Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Larry Darnell Blaylock v. The State of Texas?
The outcome was: Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed.
Which court heard Larry Darnell Blaylock v. The State of Texas?
This case was heard in Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo, TX. The presiding judge was Per Curiam.
Who were the attorneys in Larry Darnell Blaylock v. The State of Texas?
Plaintiff's attorney: Rickie R. Redman. Defendant's attorney: Need help finding a lawyer for representation for filing notices of appeal challenging convictions in Texas? Call 918-582-6422. It's Free..
When was Larry Darnell Blaylock v. The State of Texas decided?
This case was decided on March 16, 2020.