Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Patrick Jeroid Jones v. The State of Texas

Date: 03-11-2020

Case Number: 06-19-00265-CR

Judge: Josh R. Morriss, III

Court: Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

Plaintiff's Attorney: J. Randle Smolarz

Jerry D. Rochelle

Defendant's Attorney:

Call 918-582-6422 if you need a Criminal Defense Attorney in Texas.

Description:






MoreLaw Suites









Virtual Offices of Solo Practice Lawyer Starting at $200 a Month

Office With MoreLaw Suites and Reduce Your Overhead





918-582-3993 - Info@MoreLaw.com







In 2011, Patrick Jeroid Jones was convicted of tampering with a witness. On November 4,

2019, Jones filed a motion seeking the entry of a nunc pro tunc judgment. On November 20, 2019,

the trial court entered an order denying Jones’s motion, and on December 16, 2019, Jones filed a

notice of appeal attempting to appeal from the trial court’s November 20 order.

In Texas, a party may appeal only when the Texas Legislature has authorized an appeal.

Galitz v. State, 617 S.W.2d 949, 951 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). When the Legislature passes

legislation granting a right of appeal, in addition to granting its citizens that substantive right, it

also grants the appellate courts of this State jurisdiction to hear such appeals. In the absence of

such authorizing legislation, appellate courts are without jurisdiction and have no authority to act.

In the criminal context, the Texas Legislature has authorized appeals from written judgments of

conviction and a few orders deemed appealable. See Gutierrez v. State, 307 S.W.3d 318, 321 (Tex.

Crim. App. 2010). The trial court’s order denying Jones’s motion for entry of a nunc pro tunc

judgment is not an order from which the Texas Legislature has authorized an appeal. Shelby v.

State, No. 06-15-00189-CR, 2016 WL 350516, at *1 (Tex. App.—Texarkana Jan. 29, 2016, no

pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). In the absence of such an authorization, we are

without jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

By letter dated January 27, 2020, we informed Jones of this jurisdictional issue. Jones did

not respond to our letter.
Outcome:
Because the trial court’s November 20 order denying Jones’s motion for entry of a nunc pro tunc judgment is not an appealable order, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Consequently, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Patrick Jeroid Jones v. The State of Texas?

The outcome was: Because the trial court’s November 20 order denying Jones’s motion for entry of a nunc pro tunc judgment is not an appealable order, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Consequently, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Which court heard Patrick Jeroid Jones v. The State of Texas?

This case was heard in Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana, TX. The presiding judge was Josh R. Morriss, III.

Who were the attorneys in Patrick Jeroid Jones v. The State of Texas?

Plaintiff's attorney: J. Randle Smolarz Jerry D. Rochelle. Defendant's attorney: Call 918-582-6422 if you need a Criminal Defense Attorney in Texas..

When was Patrick Jeroid Jones v. The State of Texas decided?

This case was decided on March 11, 2020.