Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
In re Phillip West
Date: 02-27-2020
Case Number: 04-20-00105-CR
Judge: PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice
Court: Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Plaintiff's Attorney: Joe D. Gonzales
Defendant's Attorney:
Need help finding a lawyer for representation for filing for petition of writ of mandamus in Texas?
Call 918-582-6422. It's Free.
MoreLaw Suites
Virtual Offices of Solo Practice Lawyer Starting at $200 a Month
Office With MoreLaw Suites and Reduce Your Overhead
918-582-3993 - Info@MoreLaw.com
Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which he asserts the trial court has failed
to rule on several motions in his underlying criminal case. Relator is represented by trial counsel
below; therefore, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498
(Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro se
mandamus petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review. See id.; see also
Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding).
About This Case
What was the outcome of In re Phillip West?
The outcome was: Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
Which court heard In re Phillip West?
This case was heard in Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas, TX. The presiding judge was PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice.
Who were the attorneys in In re Phillip West?
Plaintiff's attorney: Joe D. Gonzales. Defendant's attorney: Need help finding a lawyer for representation for filing for petition of writ of mandamus in Texas? Call 918-582-6422. It's Free..
When was In re Phillip West decided?
This case was decided on February 27, 2020.