Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Shonda Renee Stubblefield

Date: 09-05-2018

Case Number:

Judge: Alfred Bennett

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (Harris County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Julie Redlinger and Michael Day

Defendant's Attorney: Marjorie A Meyers and Philip G Gallagher

Description:
Houston, TX - Local Woman Heads to Prison for Defrauding Federal Program Intended to Improve Air Quality



A 45-year-old woman has been ordered to prison on for charges related to defrauding the Federal Highway Administration Congestion mitigation Air Quality and Surface Transportation Program (FHWA-CMAQ), announced U.S. Attorney Ryan K. Patrick along with Special Agent in Charge Joseph Zschiesche of the Department of Transportation - Office of Inspector General (DOT-OIG). The jury deliberated for less than two hours following a two-day day trial before convicting Shonda Renee Stubblefield Feb. 28, 2018, of all the counts in the indictment - theft of public money, mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering and aggravated identity theft.



U.S. District Judge Alfred Bennett handed Stubblefield a total 72-month sentence - 48 months for theft, mail fraud, wire fraud and money laundering to be followed by an additional 24 months for aggravated identity theft which will be served consecutively. She will also serve three years of supervised release following her release.



At trial, a federal jury found Stubblefield, the owner of World Corporation Inc. (WCI)., stole $125,659.90 from the Department of Transportation (DOT) CMAQ program funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).



The CMAQ Program provides money to reduce traffic congestion and thereby reduce air pollution in certain areas. The jury heard that Stubblefield stole the money by falsely and fraudulently representing to Houston Galveston Area Counsel (HGAC) that she had hundreds of employees working at WCI who participated in a telework program designed to reduce air-pollution.



The United States proved at trial through documents and 26 witnesses that Stubblefield created a fake business list, fake bank records, fake income and earnings statements and other false WCI business records including employee timesheets, invoices and match documents. The testimony included that of an individual whose identification information Stubblefield stole and used to create a fake $18,100 check that was submitted to the government to further the theft. The evidence and testimony revealed Stubblefield created at least 500 fake and fictitious WCI employee profiles that included fake names, addresses and email accounts.



The defense attempted to convince the jury that Stubblefield was not the person who engaged in the criminal activity, despite the fact that her name was on virtually all WCI business records, at least four witnesses identified her and the money trail lead directly to Stubblefield’s bank account.



Stubblefield has been and will remain in custody pending transfer to a U.S. Bureau of Prisons facility to be determined in the near future.



The DOT-OIG conducted the investigation.



Charges:



THEFT OF PUBLIC MONEY

(1)



MAIL FRAUD

(2-3)

Outcome:
The defendant is sentenced to the BOP for a term of 48 months as to counts 1 thru 9 to run concurrent, and 24 months as to count 10, for a total of 72 months. 3 years of supervised release imposed as to counts 1-10 to run concurrent; standard and special conditions apply. Restitution in the amount of $125,199.40 ordered. A special assessment of $100 as to each count, total of $1000. Appeal rights addressed.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Shonda Renee Stubblefield?

The outcome was: The defendant is sentenced to the BOP for a term of 48 months as to counts 1 thru 9 to run concurrent, and 24 months as to count 10, for a total of 72 months. 3 years of supervised release imposed as to counts 1-10 to run concurrent; standard and special conditions apply. Restitution in the amount of $125,199.40 ordered. A special assessment of $100 as to each count, total of $1000. Appeal rights addressed.

Which court heard United States of America v. Shonda Renee Stubblefield?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (Harris County), TX. The presiding judge was Alfred Bennett.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Shonda Renee Stubblefield?

Plaintiff's attorney: Julie Redlinger and Michael Day. Defendant's attorney: Marjorie A Meyers and Philip G Gallagher.

When was United States of America v. Shonda Renee Stubblefield decided?

This case was decided on September 5, 2018.