Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Bradden Kyle Brown

Date: 11-05-2025

Case Number: 25-CR-22

Judge: Travis R. McDonough

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee (Hamilton County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Chattanooga

Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best Chatanooga Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory





Description:
Chattanooga, Tennessee, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with distributing a controlled substance.
Outcome:
The Defendant was found guilty and was sentenced to 135 months imprisonment, to run concurrently with any sentence imposed in Marion County, TN Criminal Court #12145 Count 2; to run consecutively to any sentence imposed in Bledsoe County, TN Criminal Court #2023-cr-6 Count 1; 5 years supervised release; $100 special assessment fee.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Bradden Kyle Brown?

The outcome was: The Defendant was found guilty and was sentenced to 135 months imprisonment, to run concurrently with any sentence imposed in Marion County, TN Criminal Court #12145 Count 2; to run consecutively to any sentence imposed in Bledsoe County, TN Criminal Court #2023-cr-6 Count 1; 5 years supervised release; $100 special assessment fee.

Which court heard United States of America v. Bradden Kyle Brown?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee (Hamilton County), TN. The presiding judge was Travis R. McDonough.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Bradden Kyle Brown?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Chattanooga. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Chatanooga Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Bradden Kyle Brown decided?

This case was decided on November 5, 2025.